Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion

Vol 3 (2020): December

Overview of Academic Stress of FPIP Psychology Study Program Students Programming Thesis Courses in 2017/2018
Gambaran Stres Akademik Mahasiswa Prodi Psikologi FPIP Yang Memprogram Mata Kuliah Skripsi Tahun 2017/2018



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.3.2020.955
Published
September 3, 2021

Abstract

The aim of this research is to find out the academic stresses of psychology study program students who are programming thesis courses, faculty of psychology and education at Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo. The method in this study uses a descriptive quantitative approach which aims to determine the intensity of academic stress on psychology students who are programming thesis courses. The research subjects were 123 out of 200 students who processed thesis courses in 2017-2018. The sample was taken using simple random sampling. The data were collected using the academic stress scale compiled by the researcher. The results of this study illustrate that the results of the intensity of student academic stress are dominated in the moderate to quite high category, namely 67%. The results of this study also illustrate that the aspects of academic stress in psychology study program students are more dominant in the physical and emotional aspects. On the physical aspect, you get 34%, on the emotional aspect you get 29% on the intellectual aspect you get 21% and on the intrapersonal aspect you get 16%.

References

  1. Agus, M. H. (1994). Stress tanpa distress: seni mengolah stress. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
  2. Arikunto, S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  3. Burka, J. B., & Yuen, L. M. (1984). Procrastination. Cambridge: Da Capo Press.
  4. Conny R. Semiawan. 1998. Perkembangan dan belajar peserta didik. Jakarta:
  5. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peran Perguruan Tinggi Islam Dalam Pengembangan Masyarakat 14 Depdikbud Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.
  6. Desmita. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  7. Fibrianti, D. (2009). Hubungan antara Dukungan Orang Tua dengan Prokastinasi Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Semarang.
  8. Hardjana. (1994). Stress Tanpa Distress : Seni Mengolah Stress.Yogyakarta. Penerbit Kanisius
  9. kusuma, P. P., & Gusniarti. (2008). Hubungan Antara Penyesuaian Diri, Sosial dengan Stress pada Siswa Ekselerasi Gifted. Jurnal Psikologi , 31-43.
  10. Lumongga, N. (2009). Depresi: Tinjauan Psikologis. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  11. Mahsun, M. (2004). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.
  12. Maramis. (2009). Catatan Ilmu Kedokteran Jiwa. Yogyakarta: Moco Medika.
  13. Monks, F. J. (2002). Psikologi Perkembangan: Pengantar Dalam Berbagai Bagiannya. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University.
  14. Ross, S. E., Niebling, B. c., & Heckert, T. M. (1999). Sources of Stress among College Students. College Student Journal , 33.
  15. Sarwono. (1987). Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Santrock, J. W. (2002). Life Span Development: Perkembangan Masa Hidup (edisi kelima). Jakarta: Erlangga.
  17. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.