Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Education

Vol 8 No 2 (2023): December

Understanding the Role of the Environmental Arena and Community Social Structure in Stunting Prevention Education
Memahami Peran Arena Lingkungan dan Struktur Sosial Masyarakat dalam Pendidikan Pencegahan Stunting



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.8667
Published
December 29, 2023

Abstract

Indonesia is a country with the third highest incidence of stunting in Southeast Asia. Stunting has various negative impacts therefore it is important to prevent it through public education. This research aims to understand the role of the environmental arena and social structure of society in stunting prevention education. This research uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. The research analysis explains the problem of stunting through four environmental arenas and social structures that exist in communities in four cities or districts, including the educational, economic, cultural, and ideological arenas. By understanding the roots of the stunting problem identified through the environmental arena and social structure of society, we can identify effective methods for stunting prevention programs in the field, namely sustainable education based on local culture in all aspects of community life.

Highlights :

  • Interconnected Factors: The research explores how various environmental arenas and social structures intertwine to contribute to the prevalence of stunting.

  • Local Cultural Context: Understanding the local cultural context is crucial for designing effective stunting prevention education programs.

  • Sustainability and Community Engagement: Emphasizing sustainable education initiatives rooted in local culture ensures long-term engagement and effectiveness in combating stunting.

Keywords : arena, education, economy, culture, ideology

References

  1. F. Apriliani, H. E. Anggraeni, I. Resmeiliana, and Y. V. Paramitadevi, “Edukasi PHBS dan Budaya 5R Pada Santri Putra di Pondok Pesantren Thoyyibah Al Islami Bogor,” J. Pus. Inov. Masy., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 89–101, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.29244/JPIM.5.1.89-101.
  2. N. Suwarta, “Nilai Pendidikan Dan Identitas Sosial Calon Brahmana Dalam Novel Arok Dedes,” Ling. Fr., vol. 6, pp. 190–198, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/lf.v6i2.
  3. A. R. Rashiva, Y. L. Subargo, and F. Baharuddin, “Implementasi MB-KM Melalui Metode Mengajar Bahasa Model Pembelajaran Student Center Learning di SMP Gema 45 Surabaya ,” GHANCARAN J. Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., no. SE-Articles, pp. 252–265, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.19105/ghancaran.vi.7591.
  4. N. Purnaningsih et al., “Upaya Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Stunting di Desa Muncanglarang, Kabupaten Tegal,” J. Pus. Inov. Masy., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 128–136, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.29244/JPIM.5.1.128-136.
  5. M. B. Eka, I. Krisnana, and D. Husada, “RISK FACTORS OF STUNTING EVENTS IN TODDLERS AGED 24-59 MONTHS,” Indones. Midwifery Heal. Sci. J., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 374–385, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.20473/imhsj.v4i4.2020.374-385.
  6. N. Nurjazuli, B. Budiyono, M. Raharjo, and N. E. Wahyuningsih, “Environmental Factors Related to Children Diagnosed with Stunting 3 Years a go in Salatiga City, Central Java, Indonesia,” Toxicol. Anal. Clin., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 198–205, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxac.2023.01.003.
  7. A. Aguilera MPH, S. Green, M. E. Greene, C. Izugbara, and E. Murphy-Graham EdD, “Multidimensional Measures are Key to Understanding Child, Early, and Forced Marriages and Unions,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 70, pp. 345–346, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.07.026.
  8. M. R. Purbowati, I. C. Ningrom, and R. W. Febriyanti, “Gerakan Bersama Kenali, Cegah, dan Atasi Stunting Melalui Edukasi Bagi Masyarakat di Desa Padamara Kabupaten Purbalingga,” AS-SYIFA J. Pengabdi. dan Pemberdaya. Kesehat. Masy., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 15, 2021, doi: 10.24853/assyifa.2.1.15-22.
  9. T. A. E. Permatasari, “PENGARUH POLA ASUH PEMBRIAN MAKAN TERHADAP KEJADIAN STUNTING PADA BALITA,” J. Kesehat. Masy. Andalas, vol. 14, no. 2 SE-Artikel Penelitian, pp. 3–11, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.24893/jkma.v14i2.527.
  10. B. Haile and D. Headey, “Growth in Milk Consumption and Reductions in Child Stunting: Historical Evidence from Cross-Country Panel Data,” Food Policy, vol. 118, p. 102485, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102485.
  11. P. Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power, 1st ed. Oxford: Polity Press, 1991.
  12. G. Ritzer and D. J. Goodman, Teori Sosiologi : dari Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Mutakhir Teori Sosial Postmodern, Terbaru. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana, 2016.
  13. Lucien Goldmann, Sociology of Literary Creativity, 4th ed. paris: International Social Science Journal Unesco, 1967.
  14. L. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, 40th ed. Bandung: Remaja RosdaKarya, 2021.
  15. J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. london: Sage publications, 2016.
  16. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
  17. J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative Quantitative And Mixed Methods Approaches, Third. California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2009.
  18. K. Burger, “Revisiting The Power of Future Expectations and Educational Path Dependencies,” Adv. Life Course Res., vol. 58, p. 100581, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100581.
  19. C. Benito and J. Filp, “The Transition from Home to School: A Socioeconomic Analysis of The Benefits of An Aducational Intervention with Families and Schools,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 53–65, 1996, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(96)82042-8.
  20. L. K. Kiramba, Q. Deng, X. Gu, A. Yunes-Koch, and K. Viesca, “Community Language Ideologies: Implications for language Policy and Practice,” Linguist. Educ., vol. 78, p. 101251, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101251.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.