Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Communication

Vol 9 No 2 (2024): December

Interpersonal Communication On The Quality Of Spousal Relationship Of Tb Ro Patients - Span Of Treatment Period
Komunikasi Interpersonal Pada Kualitas Hubungan Suami Istri Pasien Tb Ro - Rentang Masa Pengobatan



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.9.2024.8373
Published
December 29, 2023

Abstract

Tuberculosis is an irresistible illness that can go after anybody. The focal point of this examination purposely took instances of TB RO, where TB cases have a longest term of around 2 years contrasted with normal TB with a treatment time of 6 or 9 months. Then, the scientist plans to figure out the relational correspondence among husband and spouse couples, what is the nature of relational correspondence in couples impacted by TB RO illness, on the grounds that the treatment period is long, the nature of the husband and wife relationship might be viewed as in a terrible condition or the other way around, so this examination centers around the quality, for example, receptiveness, compassion, strong demeanor, inspirational perspective and balance found in relational correspondence while as yet focusing on a humanistic viewpoint where the component of humanistic accentuation is a lot of thought about in this point of view.

Highlights : 

  • Extended Treatment Impact: Investigates how the prolonged treatment duration of TB RO (up to 2 years) affects marital relationships, differing significantly from standard TB treatment timelines.
  • Communication Quality: Focuses on key aspects of communication quality in couples, including openness, empathy, supportive attitudes, positivity, and equanimity, amidst the challenges posed by TB RO.
  • Humanistic Approach: Emphasizes the importance of a humanistic perspective in understanding and addressing the psychological and emotional dimensions of coping with TB RO within marital dynamics.

Keywords : interpersonal communication, relationship quality, husband - wife, TB - RO

References

  1. Hafied Cangara, Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi . Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada , 2006.
  2. “persepsi dukungan....”.
  3. Alo Liliweri, Prasangka dan Konflik, Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Masyarakat Multikultural. Yogyakarta : LKIS , 2009.
  4. Moleong. L.J, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
  5. N.S Sukmadinata, Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009.
  6. J W Creswell, Step in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study . 2013.
  7. M Rubani, Psikologi Komunikas . Pekanbaru : CV Witra Izani, 2011.
  8. R . Cherni, “Strategi Komunikasi dalam meningkatkan konflik rumah tangga mengenai perbedaan tingkat penghasilan di RT 29 Samarinda Semarang,” E Jurnal UDIKSHA, 2013.
  9. A. Masturu, “Melalui Komunikasi Empatik. Jurnal dakwah dan Komunikasi ,” ejurnal.iainpurwokerto , 2010.
  10. A. Supratikya, Tinjauan Psikologi Komunikasi Antarpribadi . Yogyakarta : Kanisus, 1995.
  11. Etika Sari and A Herawati, “Komunikasi Keluarga (studi kasus komunikasi interpersonal suami istri dalam proses cerai di kantor urusan agama kecamatan Gamping Sleman, Yogjakarta ),” jurnalbimasislam.kemenag.go.id, 2017.
  12. A Rahayu, “Komunikasi Interpersonal Pegawai Pada Dinas. jurnal administrasi pendidikan ,” ejurnal.unp.ac.id, vol. 3, pp. 905–913, 2015.
  13. R. Jalaludin, Psikologi Komunikasi . Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, 1998.
  14. A. Joseph Devito, Komunikasi Antar Manusia , vol. 5. Jakarta : Karisma, 1997.
  15. B N Londa, “Efektifitas Komunikasi Antar Pribadi Dalam Meningkatkan Kesuksesan Sparkle Organizer ,” media.neliti.com, 2014.
  16. F. Y Panggabean, “Analisis Literasi Keuangan terhadap Keberlangsunga usaha kuliner kota medan,” pp. 139–147, 2018.
  17. N Asmarina dan Lestari M, “Gambaran Kepercayaan, komitmen pernikahan dan kepuasan hubungan seksual pada istri dengan suami yang bekerja di kapal pesiar,” jurnal psikologi udayana , pp. 239–149, 2018.
  18. E M Griffin, A First Look at Communication Theory, Special Consultant Glen McGraw Hill. 2003.
  19. H David Holtzzman, Privacy Lost: How Technology Is Endengering your privacy, USA: Jossey Bass. 2006.
  20. Alex Sobur, “Pers, Hak Privasi dan Hak Publik,” jurnal Mediator , vol. 1, 2001.
  21. petronio and sandra, “Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of disclousure, New York: state university of new york press,” new york press, 2002.
  22. Silfia Hanani, Komunikasi Antarpribadi (Teori dan Praktik). Yogjakarta : Ar- Ruzz Media, 2017.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.