Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Law

Vol 6 (2022): June

Non-compliance with the Constitutional Court's Decision from the Perspective of Constitutional Law
Ketidakpatuhan terhadap PutusanMahkamah Konstitusi dari Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.6.2022.677
Published
June 30, 2022

Abstract

This study aims to determine the forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower and to find a constitutional solution to the problem of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower.This research is a juridicial normative study using a statutory, case, and conseptual approach.Using legal materials in the form of a Constitutional Court Decision related to Manpower.From the research results, it can be concluded that the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower are not obeyed by the adressats. Various forms of non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision regarding Manpower-related Laws were not followed up and partially fulfilled in the form of government policies such as the Regulation of Minister of Manpower, Circular of the Minister of Manpower. Some laws are in the legislative process. The constitutional solution that has the potential to realized for non-compliance with the Constitutional Court Decision is the implementation of the concept of judicial order, judicial defferal, and imposition of sanctions.

References

  1. A. F. Hadjar, Pokok-Pokok Pikiran dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: KRHN dan Kemitraan, 2003.
  2. P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2011.
  3. T. Triwulan Tutik, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pascaamandemen UUD 1945. Jakarta: Cerdas Pustaka, 2008.
  4. I. Samsul, “Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jakarta, 2009.
  5. F. Laksono, W. Wijayanti, A. Triningsih, and N. Mardiya, “Implikasi dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 5/PUU-X/2012 Tentang SBI atau RSBI,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 731–760, 2013.
  6. J. Asshiddiqie and M. A. Safa’at, Theory Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, 1st ed. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Makamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.
  7. M. Farida Indrati, Ilmu Perundang-Undangan (1) (Jenis, Fungsi, Materi Muatan). Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 2007.
  8. B. Manan, Teori dan Politik Konstitusi, 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2004.
  9. Kepaniteraan dan Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi, “Laporan Tahunan MK RI Tahun 2019,” Jakarta, 2020.
  10. T. Sulistyowati, M. I. Nasef, and A. Ridho, “Constitutional Compliance atas Putusan MK oleh Lembaga Negara,” Jakarta, 2019.
  11. Bisariyadi, “Politik Penundaan Pelaksanaan Putusan Atas Nama Demokrasi,” Majalah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2017.
  12. A. Syahrizal, “Problem Implementasi Putusan MK,” J. Konstitusi, vol. 4, no. 1, 2007.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.