Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Law

Vol 5 (2021): December

Legal Liability of Abortion Perpetrators of Rape Victims in Indonesia
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pelaku Aborsi Korban Pemerkosaan di Indonesia



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.5.2021.560
Published
September 6, 2021

Abstract

Abortion is generally an act of abortion that is carried out without giving the opportunity to live outside the womb for certain reasons. Abortion committed by rape victims becomes a polemic in the context of criminal law to be held accountable. There are different formulations in the regulations that regulate even though these regulations regulate the same material so that rape victims who have abortions can be criminally charged. The method used is a statutory (normative) approach by using data collection namely laws and secondary sources of material in the form of previous thesis, books, scientific journals, and other literacy. The results of the research obtained are that the perpetrators of abortion victims of rape cannot be held criminally responsible because of the principle of no crime without fault where the perpetrators of abortion of rape victims have abortions which are prohibited by the Criminal Code but in accordance with the provisions of Article 75 paragraph (2) of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health that allows abortion due to rape.

References

  1. S. Pranata, “KEJADIAN KEGUGURAN, KEHAMILAN TIDAK DIRENCANAKAN DAN PENGGUGURAN DI INDONESIA,” Bul. Penelit. Sist. Kesehat., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 13.
  2. S. Andalangi, “TINDAKAN ABORSI DENGAN INDIKASI MEDIS KARENA TERJADINYA KEHAMILAN AKIBAT PERKOSAAN,” no. 8, p. 9.
  3. “Korban Pemerkosaan Divonis Bersalah Karena Aborsi, Pegiat HAM Protes,” BBC Indonesia.
  4. H. Ibnu and H. Arianto, “ABORTUS DALAM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA,” p. 15, 2005.
  5. “RAMA_74201_02011381419302_0018096509_0003117704_01_front_ref.pdf.” .
  6. M. F. Saada, “TINDAKAN ABORSI YANG DILAKUKAN SESEORANG YANG BELUM MENIKAH MENURUT KUHP,” no. 6, p. 9.
  7. . Eldawaty, A. Widanti, and Y. Fristikawati, “PERLINDUNGAN HAK REPRODUKSI PEREMPUAN UNTUK BER KBDIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PROGRAM JAMINAN PERSALINAN (PERMENKES NO.2562/MENKES/PER/XII/2011),” SOEPRA, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 185, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.24167/shk.v3i2.780.
  8. M. C. Laduri, “PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAKAN ABORSI MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009,” no. 5, p. 8.
  9. A. M. W. Setyowati and M. Seran, Dilema Etika dan Hukum Dalam Pelayanan Medis. Makassar: CV Mandar Maju, 2010.
  10. C. A. Onibala, “TINDAKAN ABORSI YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH DOKTER DENGAN ALASAN MEDIS MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009,” no. 4, p. 8.
  11. B. D. Putri, Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Lintas Agama. Yogyakarta: PSKK Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2005.
  12. M. U. Anshor, Fiksi Aborsi Wacana Penguatan Hak Reproduksi Perempuan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.
  13. Y. S. OFM, Kesehatan Mental 3, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta: Kanisius Anggota IKAPI, 2006.
  14. M. A. A. Khairi, “FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS LAMPUNG BANDAR LAMPUNG,” p. 13.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.