Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion

Vol 7 (2022): December

The Relationship Between The Bystander Effect and Prososial Behavior in Students Of The Faculty Of Psychology And Educational Sciences At University
Hubungan Antara Bystander Effect dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi dan Ilmu Pendidikan di Universitas



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.7.2022.5196
Published
December 31, 2022

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the bystander effect and prosocial behavior in students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo. The population in this study were students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at the Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo, totaling 2,145 students and the sample of this study was 337 students who were taken using incidental sampling technique. The data collection technique used a psychological scale with a Likert scale model. The data analysis technique used is the product moment correlation technique assisted by SPSS 16.0 for windows. The results of data analysis show that there is a significant positive relationship between the bystander effect and prosocial behavior in students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo.

Highlights:

  • The study examines the relationship between bystander effect and prosocial behavior in students of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences.
  • The population consists of 2,145 students, with a sample of 337 students selected using incidental sampling technique.
  • Data analysis using the product moment correlation technique reveals a significant positive relationship between the bystander effect and prosocial behavior in the studied student population.

Keywords: Bystander effect, Prosocial behavior, Students, Muhammadiyah University of Sidoarjo, Correlation analysis

References

  1. W. Hulukati dan M. R. Djibran, “Analisis Tugas Perkembangan Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo,” Bikotetik (Bimbingan dan Konseling Teor. dan Prakt., vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 73–114, 2018, doi: 10.26740/bikotetik.v2n1.p73-80.
  2. N. Eisenberg dan P. H. Mussen, The roots of prosocial behavior in children. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  3. D. O. Sears, J. L. Freedman, dan L. A. Peplau, Psikologi Sosial, Edisi Keli. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1985.
  4. Baron, A. R, dan & Byrne D, Psikologi Sosial, Ke-10., vol. 1 & 2. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2005.
  5. Nashori dan F.H, Psikologi Social Islam. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2008.
  6. K. Cherry, “The Bystander Effect,” Verywell Mind, 2020. https://www.verywellmind.com/the-bystander-effect-2795899 (diakses Jun 25, 2022).
  7. Sarwono, W.S & Meinarno, dan A. E, Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2009.
  8. Latané, B & Darley, dan J.M, “Bystander Interventionin Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 1968, doi: 10.1037/H0025589.
  9. R. Hortensius dan B. de Gelder, “From Empathy to Apathy: The Bystander Effect Revisited,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 27, no. 4, hal. 249–256, 2018, doi: 10.1177/0963721417749653.
  10. N. K. Asra, “Hubungan antara Persepsi Bystander Effect dengan Perilaku Prososial pada peserta didik di SMA Negeri 10 Palembang,” UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, 2021.
  11. Nurhalizah, “Hubungan Antara Bystander Effect Dengan Perilaku Prososial Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Medan Area,” Skripsi, 2019.
  12. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, Edisi Keem. Alfabeta Cv, 2019.
  13. S. Azwar, Validitas dan Reliabilitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2013.
  14. A. R. Hermawan, “Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan Dan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusiaterhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kota Kediri Periode 2017-2020,” J. Ilm. Multi Disiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 163–173, 2022, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://katadata.co.id/berita/2020/01/06/baru-83-peserta-bpjs-kesehatan-per-akhir-2019-.
  15. I. F. Reza, Metodologi Penelitian Psikologi Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan Kombinasi. Palembang. Palembang: Noer Fikri Offset, 2016.
  16. N. M. I. Priliandini, P. D. Pradnyanitasari, dan K. A. Kurniawan, “Pengaruh Pengalaman Usaha Dan Penggunaan Informasi Akuntansi Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha,” J. Ris. Manaj. Sekol. Tinggi Ilmu Ekon. Widya Wiwaha Progr. Magister Manaj., vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 25–37, 2020, doi: 10.32477/jrm.v6i1.29.
  17. A. M. Putra, Bahtiar, dan A. Upe, “Eksistensi Kebudayaan Tolong Menolong (Kaseise) Sebagai Bentuk Solidaritas Sosial Pada Masyarakat Muna (Studi di Desa Mataindaha Kecamatan Pasikolaga),” Neo Soc., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 476–483, 2018, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/vnucx/%0Ahttps://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/vnucx/download.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.