Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Law

Vol 8 No 1 (2023): June

First Resort: Alternative Dispute Resolution for Breach of Verbal Purchase Agreements
Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif: Pilihan Utama untuk Menyelesaikan Pelanggaran Kesepakatan Pembelian Verbal dalam Bisnis



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.5014
Published
June 26, 2023

Abstract

Disputes over breach of verbal purchase agreements often occur in society, particularly in the business sector. The purpose of this study is to analyze efforts to resolve such disputes based on Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. The research method used is normative research. The results of this study show that efforts to resolve disputes over breach of verbal purchase agreements can be carried out through non-litigation based on the selection of Alternative Dispute Resolution methods, such as Negotiation, Mediation, Conciliation, and Arbitration based on Law No. 30/1999. Non-litigation resolution is intended as the first resort and considers the court as a last resort, in addition, the evidence tools as regulated in Article 1866 of the Civil Code need to be presented because the agreement was made verbally.

Highlights :

  • Disputes over breach of verbal purchase agreements are common in the business sector.
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution methods such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration can be used to resolve disputes based on Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.
  • Non-litigation resolution is the preferred approach, with the court being considered as a last resort, and evidence tools as regulated in Article 1866 of the Civil Code need to be presented for verbal agreements.

Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Verbal Purchase Agreements, Non-litigation, Law No. 30/1999, Evidence Tools

References

  1. Muhamad Sadi Is, 2017, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, h. 79.
  2. Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Perdata
  3. I Made Aditia Warmadewa and I Made Udiana, “Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Baku” Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum; Vol 5 No 2 (2017). 2016.
  4. Erman Rajaguguk. Arbitrase dalam Putusan Pengadilan. (Jakarta: Chandra Pratama. 2001) hlm. 30.
  5. Ariani, Nevey Varida (2012). “Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di luar pengadilan”, Jurnal RechtsVinding Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. 1(2): 278.
  6. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa
  7. Endrik Saifudin, S.H.I., M.H. 2018. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dan Arbitrase. Cetakan Pertama. Malang. Intrans Publishing.
  8. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan
  9. Gatot Sumartono, Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Umum, Jakarta, 2006, hlm. 133-134.
  10. Susialawetty. Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa diTinjau dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan. Gramatika Publishing. Bekasi. 2013. Hlm. 27.
  11. Alethia Rabbani. 2020. Pengertian Konsiliasi, Karakteristik, Tujuan, Tahapan, Keuntungan dan Contohnya. https://www.sosiologi79.com/2020/05/pengertian-konsiliasi-karakteristik.htm?/m=1. Diakses pada 08 Agustus 2022. Pukul 23.10
  12. Dewi Tuti Muryanti, B. Rini Heryanti. Pengaturan Dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi Di Bidang Perdagangan. Jurnal Dinamika Sosbud. Vol.13 No.1. Juni 2011. Hlm.62.
  13. Herzien Inlandsch Reglement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.