Vol 8 (2023): June (in progress)
Education

The Influence of Cooperative Learning Model on Science Learning Outcomes of Grade 4 Students in Elementary School
Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas 4 di Sekolah Dasar


Eli Rusdian Rismah
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
Nur Efendi
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia *

(*) Corresponding Author
Published June 26, 2023
Keywords
  • Cooperative Learning,
  • Learning Outcomes
How to Cite
Rismah, E. R., & Efendi, N. (2023). The Influence of Cooperative Learning Model on Science Learning Outcomes of Grade 4 Students in Elementary School. Academia Open, 8, 10.21070/acopen.8.2023.4380. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.4380

Abstract

Student learning outcomes are often referred to as learning achievement. Student learning outcomes can be obtained through learning acticities that have been carried out, and each learning outcomes obtained bt sudents who have different levels. This study aims to: 1) determine whether or not there is an effect of cooperative learning model on science learning outcomes for fourth grade elementary school students, 2) find out how much influence cooperative learning model has on science learning outcomes for fourth grade elementary school students. This research uses a quantitavie experimental appoarch with a quasi-experimental type of research. The research design used a non- equivalentcontrol group design research design. The samples in this study were 16 students in class IV-A as the control class and 16 students in clas IV-B in elementary school as the experimental class. Data collection in this study is by using pre-tes and post-test techniques in the form of cognitive questions. The data were analyzed using t-test science learning outcomes and a effect size test to determine how much influence cooperative learning model has on science learning outcomes. The results of the pre-test hypothesis test for the control class and experimental class are 0,659<2,042, so ho is accepted and hi is rejected. While the results of the post-test hypothesis of the class control and experimental class are 3,963>2,042, so ho is accepted. In addition, the results og the effect size calculation show a large effect because 0,8<1,40<2,0, so from the results obtained it is concluded that: 1) there is an effect of cooperative learning model on science learning outcomes for fourth grade elementary school students, 2) there is a large cooperative model effect on science learning outcomes for fourth grade elemntary school students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A. &. A. H. Jihad, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Multi Presinso, 2013.
  2. A. &. Krathwohl, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan; e-Saintika, p. 136, 2019.
  3. Arends, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair And Share (TPS) Pada Diklat Penilaia Angka Kredit Guru Madasah Kemenag Kabupaten Indragri Hilir,” 2020.
  4. Isjoni, Cooperative Learning, Bandung : Alfabeta, 2014.
  5. d. Rukminingsih, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Penelitian Kuantitaif, Penelitian Kualitatif, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Yogyakarta: Erhaka Utama, 2020.
  6. Arikunto, Dasar Metodologi Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Literasi Media Publishing, 2019.
  7. Cohen, “Metode Penelitian,” p. 39, 2018.
  8. Slavin, “Dampak Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Membentuk Kelompok Pada Setiap Pertemuan,” 2019.
  9. R. d. Jhonson, “Dampak Pembelajaran Daring Dengan Membentuk Kelompok Pada Setiap Pertemuannya,” 2019.
  10. Bloom, “Mmeningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Biologi Remap STAD,” p. 610, 2017.
  11. d. Ramadhan, “Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Biologi Remap STAD,” p. 610, 2017.
  12. Ibid, “Ppengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Team Quiziz Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran PKN Di SDN 1 Tuluserejo Kecamatan Pekalongan Tahun Pelajaran 2017/2018,” p. 12, 2018.