Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Business and Economics

Vol 8 No 1 (2023): June

Discrepancies in Website Accounting: Non-compliance with ISAK 14
Terungkapnya Ketidaksesuaian: Ketidakpatuhan Pengakuan dan Perlakuan Akuntansi Website dengan ISAK 14



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.3909
Published
June 26, 2023

Abstract

This scientific article presents a qualitative research study aimed at examining the recognition and accounting treatment of websites as intangible assets. Focusing on the case of the Ricosta website, the research demonstrates that the current practice of categorizing the website as other expenses in financial statements contradicts the guidelines outlined in ISAK 14. By utilizing narrative data and descriptive analysis, the study unveils the misalignment between the recognized accounting treatment and the stipulated requirements. The results highlight the need for adherence to proper recognition and accounting practices for websites as intangible assets, offering implications for companies and standard-setting bodies in promoting accurate financial reporting.

Highlights:

  • Non-compliance with ISAK 14: The research uncovers the misalignment between the recognition and accounting treatment of websites as intangible assets and the guidelines stated in ISAK 14.
  • Financial statement impact: The study reveals that the current practice categorizes website expenses as other expenses, contrasting with the potential recognition of websites as intangible assets, which can significantly affect the financial statements of companies.
  • Implications for accurate financial reporting: The findings emphasize the importance of adhering to proper recognition and accounting practices for websites as intangible assets, suggesting implications for companies and standard-setting bodies to ensure accurate and transparent financial reporting.

Keywords: website recognition, accounting treatment, intangible assets, ISAK 14, financial statements.

References

  1. J. H. Mustakini, “Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Edisi ke-6. Yogyakarta. Universitas Gajah Mada.,” 2014.
  2. P. D. Sugiono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif.pdf,” Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. 2014.
  3. S. Hermawan and Amirullah, “Metode Penelitian Bisnis Bandung,” CV Alfa Beta, 2016.
  4. S. Hermawan and Amirullah, Metode Penelitian. 2016.
  5. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Cetakan 19. Bandung: Alfabeta CV., 2013.
  6. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&DSugiyono. 2013. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&D.” Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitaif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. https://doi.org/10.1. 2013.
  7. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Cetakan ke. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.
  8. U. Silalahi, “Metode Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif,” J. Vis. Lang. Comput., 2015.
  9. U. Sekaran and Bougie, “Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian,” in Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis Pendekatan Pengembangan-Keahlian, 2017.
  10. W. Darmalaksana, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan,” Pre-print Digit. Libr. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.