Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Business and Economics

Vol 8 No 1 (2023): June

Accountability Boost: Internet Reporting and Good Governance in Action
Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas melalui Internet Financial Reporting dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan yang Baik: Analisis Kualitatif



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.3579
Published
June 26, 2023

Abstract

This research examines the implementation of Internet Financial Reporting (IFR) and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) as means to enhance accountability in an organization. Employing qualitative approaches and naturalistic paradigms, this study investigates the application of IFR and the adherence to GCG principles at LAZ Rumah Zakat, a charitable organization. The research employs library research techniques for data collection, analysis, and conclusion drawing. The results reveal a commendable level of internet reporting on the organization's website and a satisfactory implementation of the five principles of GCG at Rumah Zakat. These findings highlight the potential of IFR and GCG in improving accountability and have implications for organizations worldwide seeking to enhance their financial reporting practices and governance mechanisms.

Highlights:

  • Implementation of Internet Financial Reporting (IFR): Analyzing the effectiveness of IFR in enhancing accountability.
  • Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles: Assessing the adherence to GCG principles and their impact on accountability.
  • Qualitative Analysis: Utilizing a qualitative approach to examine the implementation of IFR and GCG and their implications for LAZ Rumah Zakat.

Keywords: Accountability, Internet Financial Reporting, Good Corporate Governance, Qualitative Analysis, LAZ Rumah Zakat.

References

  1. B. S. Bachri, “Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi pada Penelitian Kualitatif.Universitas Negri Surabaya. Surabaya,” 2010.
  2. D. M. A. Lexy J. Moleong, “Moleong, Lexi J, 2014. ” Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi”. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.,” PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2019.
  3. D. M. A. Lexy J. Moleong, “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi),” PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.055.
  4. H. Chen, Q. Tang, Y. Jiang, and Z. Lin, “The Role of International Financial Reporting Standards in Accounting Quality: Evidence from the European Union,” no. 70872067, p. 2004, 2004.
  5. I. Gunawan, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Praktik,” Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 2014.
  6. M. P. Soni and A. Irwandi, “Faktor–Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pelaporan Keuangan Melalui Internet (Internet Financial Reporting) Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia,” Indones. Account. Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2012, doi: 10.14414/tiar.v2i02.91.
  7. M. P. Dr. Wahidmurni, “Pemaparan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif,” UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2017.
  8. M. Yusuf, Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
  9. Sugiyono, “Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif,” Bandung Alf., 2016
  10. W. Darmalaksana, “Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan,” Pre-print Digit. Libr. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2020.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.