Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Business and Economics

Vol 5 (2021): December

Influence of Independent Board Commissioner, Institutional Ownership, and Audit Committee on Tax Avoidance
Pengaruh Independent Board Commissioner, Institutional Ownership, Dan Audit Committee Terhadap Tax Avoidance



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.5.2021.2277
Published
December 25, 2021

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the Independent Board Commissioner, Institutional Ownership and Audit Committee on Tax Avoidance. This study uses quantitative research methods using statistical techniques by processing existing data to prove the proposed research hypothesis. In this case, the object of research is a mining company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the 2015-2019 period. Purposive sampling method for determining the sample with a population of 39 companies and a sample of 11 companies. The analytical method used is multiple regression analysis with SPSS version 25 program. Partially, the results show that the independent board commissioner and audit committee have no effect on tax avoidance. Meanwhile, institutional ownership has an effect on tax avoidance.

References

  1. D. H. Jayani, “Realisasi Penerimaan Pajak 57% dari Target APBN 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020, from Google: https://databoks.katadata.co.id,” 2019. .
  2. H. D. Sarra, “Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi, Komite Audit dan Dewan Komisaris Independen (Studi Empiris Pada Industri Kimia dan Logam di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2014),” Compet. J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 63, 2017, doi: 10.31000/competitive.v1i1.108.
  3. A. Eksandy, “Pengaruh Komisaris Independen, Komite Audit, dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Tax Avoidance) (Studi Empiris Pada Sektor Industri Barang Konsumsi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2014),” Compet. J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.31000/competitive.v1i1.96.
  4. M. Samsul, Pasar Modal dan Manajemen Portofolio Edisi 2. Surabaya: Erlangga, 2015.
  5. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
  6. W. W. Hidayat, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Studi Kasus Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Indonesia,” 2018.
  7. C. Swingly and Sukartha, “Pengaruh Karakter Eksekutif, Komite Audit, Ukuran Perusahaan, Leverage, dan Sales Growth pada Tax Avoidance,” J. Akunt., vol. 1, pp. 47–62, 2015.
  8. A. Feranika, H. Mukhzarudfa, and M. Asep, “Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Dewan Komisaris Independen, Kualitas Audit, Komite Audit, Karakter Eksekutif, dan Leverage terhadap Tax Avoidance.,” J. Akunt., vol. 62, no. 2, 2016.
  9. F. Tiala, R. Ratnawati, and M. T. N. Rokhman, “Pengaruh Komite Audit, Return on Assets (Roa), Dan Leverage Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” J. Bisnis Terap., vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 9–20, 2019, doi: 10.24123/jbt.v3i01.1980.
  10. I. Ghozali, Aplikasi Analisi Multivariate SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2018.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.