Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Business and Economics

Vol 5 (2021): December

The Influence of Borrower Characteristics, Loan Size, Business Income and Business Experience on Cooperative Loan Returns
Pengaruh Karakteristik Peminjam, Besar Pinjaman, Pendapatan Usaha dan Pengalaman Usaha Terhadap Pengembalian Pinjaman Koperasi



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.5.2021.1749
Published
December 24, 2021

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of Borrower Characteristics, Loan Amount, Business Income and Business Experience on Cooperative Loan Repayment in Savings and Loan Cooperatives and Multipurpose Cooperatives in Candi District, Sidoarjo Regency. This research is a type of quantitative research. The sample used in this study was 150 respondents at the Savings and Loans Cooperative and Multi-Business Cooperative in Candi District, Sidoarjo Regency. The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling. Data was collected by distributing questionnaires. The research method to test the quality of the data using validity and reliability tests. Meanwhile, for data analysis using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) with AMOS 24 software. The results of this study indicate that borrower characteristics, loan size, business income and business experience have a positive and significant impact on cooperative loan repayments.

References

  1. Robbins, Stephen, and M. Coulter, Manajemen. Jilid 2, Edisi 10. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.
  2. L. A. D. Budi and I. G. A. Wirajaya, “Pengaruh Jumlah Tanggungan, Pendapatan Usaha, dan Besar Pinjaman pada Tingkat Kelancaran Pengembalian Kredit,” E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1077–1104, 2018.
  3. M. Asih, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Pengembalian Kredit Pengusaha Kecil Pada Program Kemitraan Corporate Social Responsibility (Studi kasus : PT Telkom Drive II Jakarta),” J. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 73–94, 2014.
  4. N. L. A. Windariani and N. G. P. Wirawati, “Jumlah Tanggungan Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Pengalaman Usaha dan Pendapatan UMKM Pada Kolektibilitas KUR Mikro BRI,” E-Jurnal Akunt. Univ. Udayana, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 943–972, 2017.
  5. N. Nawai and M. N. M. Shariff, “Factors Affecting Repayment Performance in Microfinance Programs in Malaysia,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 62, pp. 806–811, 2012.
  6. L. Rosiana, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kelancaran Pengembalian Pembiayaan Musyarakah Pada Debitur Usaha Mikro Kopena Cabang Bojong Kabupaten Pekalongan 2015,” Dr. Diss. Stain Pekalongan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 202–213, 2015.
  7. C. R. Marantika and R. D. Sampurno, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mikro,” Dipenogoro J. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2013.
  8. P. Widyartati, “Faktor – Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pinjaman Macet Dana Bergulir Di BKM Sendan Mukti Kelurahan Sendangguwo Kecamatan Tembalang Kota Semarang,” J. STIE SEMARANG, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2016.
  9. M. M. Papias and P. Ganesan, “Repayment behaviour in credit and savings cooperative societies: Empirical and theoretical evidence from rural Rwanda,” Int. J. Soc. Econ., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 608–625, 2019.
  10. B. H. Mpogole, I. Mwaungulu, and S. Mlasu, “Multiple Borrowing and Loan Repayment : A Study of Microfinance Clients at Iringa , Tanzani,” Glob. J. Manag. Bus. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1–7, 2012.
  11. O. . Edet, E. . Agbachom, J. A. Igiri, and G. . Sampson, “Analysis of Borrowing and Repayment of Credit among Livestock Farmers in Cross River State, Nigeria,” Glob. J. Pure Appl. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2016.
  12. L. I. Widayanthi, “Pengaruh Karakteristik Debitur UMKM Terhadap Tingkat Pengembalian Kredit Pundi Bali Dwipa (Studi Kasus Nasabah PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Bali Kanrtor Cabang Singaraja),” J. Ilm. Mhs. Fak. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2012.
  13. D. Y. Arinta, “Pengaruh Karakteristik Individu, Karakteristik Usaha, Karakteristik Kredit Terhadap Kemampuan Debitur Membayar Kredit Pada BPR Jatim Cabang Probolinggo,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Fak. Ekon. dan Bisnis Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2014.
  14. S. H. Mokhtar, G. Nartea, N. Zealand, and C. Gan, “Determinants of microcredit loans repayment problem among microfinance borrowers in Malaysia,” Determ. microcredit loans Repaym. Probl. among microfinance borrowers Malaysia, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 33–45, 2012.
  15. N. Arinda and G. Maski, “Analisis Pengaruh Usia, Jumlah Tanggungan Dalam Keluarga, Pengalaman Usaha, Omzet Usaha dan Jumlah Pinjaman Terhadap Tingkat Pengembalian Kredit Oleh UMKM. Studi Kasus : Bank Perkreditan Rakyat ( BPR ) Gunung Ringgit Malang,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Fak. Ekon. dan Bisnis Univ. Brawijaya, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2015.
  16. N. W. F. Wulandari, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kolektibilitas Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) Mikro BRI (Studi Empiris pada Debitur KUR Mikro BRI Unit Renon),” J. Sains, Akunt. dan Manaj. (Vol. 1, No. 3), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–49, 2019.
  17. I. A. Ojiako, A. O. Idowu, and B. C. Ogbukwa, “Determinants of Loan Repayment Behaviour of Smallholder Cooperative Farmers in Yewa North Local Government Area of Ogun State , Nigeria : an Application of Tobit Model,” J. Econ. Sustain. Dev., vol. 5, no. 16, pp. 144–154, 2014.
  18. M. Thoha, Perilaku Debitur: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.
  19. Suriya, “Pengaruh Faktor Internal Bank dan Internal Debitur Teradap Kredit Bermasalah Pada PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (PERSERO), Tbk.,” J. Fak. Ekon. dan Bisnis Univ. Hassanudin Makasar, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 44–56, 2012.
  20. M. Abdurrahman, “Promoting Effective Poverty Alleviation and Rural Development in Indonesian throught Micro and Macra Policies: A Sociological Perspective,” J. Econ. Int. Financ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 66–72, 2015.
  21. A. Yulianto, “Pengaruh Faktor Internal Bank dan Internal Debitur Terhadap Kredit Bermasalah Pada PT. Bank Negeri Indonesia (Persero), Tbk.,” E-Jurnal Akunt., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 45–54, 2017.
  22. Sugiyono, Metode Penlitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta., 2016.
  23. I. Ghozali, Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep Dan Aplikasi Dengan Program AMOS 24. Semarang: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro, 2017.
  24. S. Bob, B. Juma, N. N. Isaac, and T. Zainabu, “Borrowers characteristics, credit terms and loan repayment performance among clients of microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from rural Uganda,” J. Econ. Int. Financ., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018.
  25. A. Gustavo, Barboza, C. Smith, and I. Boubacar, “A Contribution to the Empirics of Consumers’ Anxiety Behavior on and in Credit Card Repayment. Credit Card Management and Financial Literacy Among College Student,” J. Financ. Manag. Mark. Institutions, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–66, 2017.
  26. Ibeleme, N. Sysvester, C. Godwin, and J. Odienye, “Deteminants of Loan Size And Repayment Performance of Small Oil Producers in Negeria : The Care Study of Abia State,” Int. J. Bus. Manag. Adm., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 43–54, 2013.
  27. Afriyeni, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Pengembalian Kredit Usaha Rakyat (KUR) Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Unit Talang Cabang Solok,” J. Ilm. Keuang. dan Perbank., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 207–222, 2013.
  28. D. V. Ramanujam and K. A. Vidya, “A Study on The Credit Repayment Behaviour of Borrowers,” Int. Res. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 8, 2017.
  29. I. Manuba and N. Djinar, “The Effect of Character, Capacity, Capital, Collateral, Condition of Economic and Constraints on Credit Giving Decisions,” Int. J. Sci. an Res., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 278–281, 2019.
  30. R. F. Makorere, “Factors affecting loan repayment behaviour in Tanzania : Empirical evidence from Dar es Salaam and Morogoro regions,” Int. J. Dev. Sustain., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 481–492, 2014.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.