Zaskia Firyal Rachman (1), Hanna Nurhaqiqi (2)
General Background: In the digital age, online media significantly shape public perception, particularly on social issues like bullying. Specific Background: The case of a high school student coerced into barking by a parent drew national attention, highlighting divergent media narratives. Knowledge Gap: Despite growing media coverage of bullying, limited research has examined how different news platforms frame the same incident. Aims: This study investigates how Kompas.com and Tempo.co framed the "barking student" case using Robert N. Entman’s framing model. Results: Kompas.com employed an empathetic frame emphasizing child protection and psychological impact, while Tempo.co adopted a legalistic frame spotlighting law enforcement and institutional response. Novelty: By comparing two prominent Indonesian media outlets, this study reveals how contrasting journalistic orientations construct divergent social realities from a single event. Implications: The findings underscore the media’s role in agenda setting and the ethical responsibility of news platforms in shaping public discourse on sensitive issues like bullying.Highlight :
The study highlights contrasting framing strategies used by Kompas.com (empathetic) and Tempo.co (legalistic) in reporting the same bullying case.
It applies Robert N. Entman’s framing model, showing how different media define problems, assign causes, make moral judgments, and suggest solutions.
The research underscores the power of media in shaping public perception and constructing different social realities from a single incident.
Keywords : Media Framing, Bullying, Kompas.com, Tempo.co, Entman Framing Theory
M. I. Y. Adventy dan R. Putra, “Model Strategi Agenda Penanganan Kekerasan Seksual Melalui Media Konvergen,” JIAP, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
A. Agustini, “Health Effect and Cross-Cultural Adaptation Caused by Cultural Shock: A Communication Perspective,” Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Mulawarman, vol. 3, no. 1, 2021.
Z. Ayusazky dan D. S. Kusuma Dewi, “Trend in Child Violence in Indonesia and Governance,” DIA: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, vol. 21, no. 2, 2021.
H. Christin, D. Hidayat, dan E. Rachmiatie, “Construction of Social Reality for Physical Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 331–347, 2021.
Eriyanto, Analisis Framing: Konstruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media, Yogyakarta: LKiS, 2011.
Z. Febriyanti dan N. N. Karina, “Konstruksi Berita CNN Indonesia Tentang Gibran,” Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, vol. 2, no. 6, 2021.
R. Fiorentina, M. Mayasari, dan F. Hariyanto, “Analisis Framing Pemberitaan ‘Reuni Akbar 212’ di Media Online Tirto.id dan Viva.co.id,” Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana, vol. 3, no. 2, 2018.
E. Hidayat, “Analisis Framing Media dan Tanggapan Pemirsa: Polemik Al-Zaytun,” Tesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2021.
F. Y. Putri, W. Wardah, dan N. Nasrulhaq, “Agenda-Setting Kebijakan Omnibus Law dalam Perspektif Framing Program TV Mata Najwa,” KIMAP, 2021.
M. H. Putra dan A. Y. Gustia, “Analisis Framing Berita Bullying pada Siswa SMP Cilacap di Detik.com,” Al Munir: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam, vol. 14, no. 2, 2021.
L. Rahmawati dan H. Setiawan, “Analisis Framing Berita Kasus Pencabulan Murid SD di Bekasi pada Media Online Kompas.com dan Detik.com,” Jurnal On Education, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 6324–6331, 2021.
E. Rachmiatie, D. Hidayat, dan H. Christin, “Construction of Social Reality for Physical Distancing During the COVID‑19 Pandemic,” Jurnal Komunikasi, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 331–347, 2021.
R. Rismayanti, “Framing Berita Perundungan dalam Media Elektronik sebagai Bahan Ajar,” Skripsi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2020.
A. Sobur, Analisis Teks Media: Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis dan Framing, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2002.
F. D. Yanti, A. K. Fata, dan A. Anwari, “Berita Bullying di Media Online: Analisis Wacana terhadap Kompas.com dan Republika Online,” Jurnalisa, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.