Mohammad Fadhil Wibowo (1), M. Kasim M (2), Arbainah Saidi (3), Rusli Rusli (4)
General Background: The administration of registration, issuance, and delivery of replacement land certificates is a crucial component of land services in Indonesia to ensure legal certainty of land ownership; however, its implementation often faces administrative and technical challenges. Specific Background: At the Samarinda City Land Office, this process includes the registration of the Land Registration Certificate, field inspections, public announcements in mass media, and final certificate delivery, which are largely conducted in accordance with regulations but still encounter obstacles. Knowledge Gap: Empirical studies examining the supporting and inhibiting factors of replacement certificate administration at the city level remain limited. Aims: This study aims to analyze the implementation of replacement certificate administration at the Samarinda City Land Office and identify factors that support and hinder the process. Results: Using a qualitative approach through interviews, observations, and documentation, the study found that integration of the KKP database and adequate human resources were the main supporting factors, while constraints included incomplete applicant documents, lack of survey copies, and ineffective communication between officers and applicants. Novelty: This research provides a detailed empirical overview of the dynamics of replacement certificate administration at the municipal level and emphasizes the importance of active applicant involvement. Implications: Recommendations include enhancing public outreach, strengthening staff capacity, and optimizing land information systems to improve the effectiveness of public services.
Highlights:
Highlights integration of KKP database as a key enabler.
Identifies main obstacles in document completeness and communication.
Emphasizes active applicant involvement in speeding up processes.
Keywords: Replacement Certificate, Land Administration, Public Service, Legal Certainty
Waskito, Modul Pendaftaran Tanah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian ATR/BPN, 2018.
H. Usman and P. S. Akbar, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
M. Idrus, Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: PT Gelora Aksara Pratama, 2009.
I. K. Syafiie, Ilmu Administrasi. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: [Publisher not stated], [Year not stated].
S. Hadi, Metodologi Research 2. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi Offset, 2004.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2012.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2009.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2015.
S. Siregar, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana, 2014.
U. Silalahi, Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung, Indonesia: Refika Aditama, 2012.
Republic of Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960: Peraturan Dasar-Dasar Pokok Agraria, 1960.
Republic of Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997: Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, 1997.
L. Lianggui, L. Zhengjin, J. Huiling, and Z. Yu, “Web-Based Registration and Certificate Management System and Method,” 2018.
P. D. Gi, “An Online System Issuing a Certificate File Restricting Its Submission Office,” 2016.
L. Xiaodong, Y. Jiankang, and K. Ning, “CA Certificate Issuance Method and System,” 2016.
J. Kessler, M. A. Larosa, A. P. Vira, A. A. Kinariwala, S. S. Dhamankar, and G. A. Trujillo, “Certification Management System,” 2015.
A. P. Meilita, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pihak Ketiga Sebagai Pemegang Sertipikat Hak Milik Terhadap Penerbitan Sertipikat yang Cacat Administrasi,” 2015.
A. Garba, Q. Hu, Z. Chen, and M. R. Asghar, “BB-PKI: Blockchain-Based Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management,” in High Performance Computing and Communications, 2020, doi: 10.1109/HPCC-SMARTCITY-DSS50907.2020.00108.
B. A. Scriber, “Systems and Methods for Secure Certificate Management,” 2017.
R. Pallo and C. Banoet, “Masalah dalam Implementasi Ketentuan Waktu Pelayanan Sertifikat Tanah,” Pancasila and Law Review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2023, doi: 10.59001/pjls.v2i2.135.
R. I. Soewito and G. Djajaputra, “Legal Certainty for Holders of Land Rights Over the Issuance of Multiple Certificates,” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.38035/jlph.v4i4.513.
M. Lien and G. Gunanegara, “Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertipikat Hak Milik yang Tanahnya Diterbitkan Kembali Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Nama Pihak Ketiga,” Notary Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.19166/nj.v4i1.7707.
A. R. Hakim and M. A. Idrus, “Prosedur Penerbitan Sertifikat Elektronik sebagai Bukti Autentik Penguasaan Hak atas Tanah,” Juridica, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 191–200, 2021, doi: 10.46601/JURIDICA.V3I1.191.
S. Sumarhadi, I. Fitri, and N. Nurhayati, “E-LAS (Letter of Active Status) pada Biro Administrasi Akademik,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (JTIK), vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.35870/jtik.v6i2.410.
“E-LAS (Letter of Active Status) pada Biro Administrasi Akademik,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (JTIK), vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.35870/jtik.v6i2.410.
N. Nurlaila, N. Nurhasanah, and Z. Zuriatin, “Optimalisasi Pelayanan Perizinan dengan Sistem Online Single Submission (OSS) dalam Mempercepat Pembangunan di Kota Bima,” Gema Wisata, vol. 20, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.56910/gemawisata.v20i3.390.
M. I. Arisaputra, M. Ashri, K. Abdullah, and D. U. M. Bakar, “Akuntabilitas Administrasi Pertanahan dalam Penerbitan Sertifikat,” Mimbar Hukum, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 221–237, 2017, doi: 10.22146/jmh.16383.