Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Academia Open

Education

Vol 8 No 2 (2023): December

Students’ Vocabulary Learning through Augmented Reality (AR): EFL Student Teachers’ Perceptions
Persepsi Calon Guru Bahasa Inggris terhadap Pembelajaran Kosa Kata melalui Augmented Reality (AR)



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.8.2023.7006
Published
July 25, 2023

Abstract

This study explores the integration of Augmented Reality (AR) into English language education, focusing on the topic of professions. Student teachers in a Micro Teaching class were invited to assess the AR-based learning activities designed to aid vocabulary comprehension. Questionnaires were distributed to gather perceptions on the potential usefulness and suitability of the AR product for classroom use. The results affirm that AR holds great promise in enlivening and enriching English language lessons, as student teachers provided numerous creative ideas for its implementation. Valuable recommendations for product improvement were also obtained. As English teachers strive to develop effective teaching media, they should consider how such technology facilitates meaningful learning objectives. This research offers insights into the positive impact of AR in language education and highlights its implications for improving students' language proficiency in specific domains.

Highlights:

  • AR integration in English learning: Augmented Reality (AR) offers an innovative approach to enhance English vocabulary learning in the context of professions, fostering greater engagement and interactive classroom experiences.

  • Perceptions of student teachers: The study gathers valuable insights from student teachers' perceptions, highlighting their ideas and suggestions for effectively implementing AR-based learning activities in language classrooms.

  • Implications for language education: The research underscores the potential of AR as a teaching tool, emphasizing its positive impact on language proficiency and the importance of meaningful content to facilitate effective learning outcomes.

Keywords: Augmented Reality (AR), English Vocabulary, Profession, Student Teachers, Learning Activities

References

  1. J. M. Quinn, R. K. Wagner, Y. Petscher, and D. Lopez, "Students’ vocabulary learning through augmented reality (AR): EFL student teachers’ perceptions," Child Dev, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 159–175, 2015.
  2. R. Mayer, "A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles," Psychol. Learn. Motiv., vol. 63, pp. 1–23, 2016.
  3. G. Barkhuizen and A. Feryok, "Pre‐service teachers’ perceptions of a short‐term international experience programme," Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 115–134, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1080/13598660500479904.
  4. N. P. L. Nariyati, Sudirman, and N. P. A. Pratiwi, "EFL pre-service teachers’ perception toward the use of mobile assisted language learning in teaching English," International Journal of Language Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38–47, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10052.
  5. F. Megawati, N. Mukminatien, A. I. Permana, L. A. Dewi, and F. Fitriati, "Emergency remote teaching and learning: Technology-based instructional plan across grade levels," Teaching English with Technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 112–126, 2021.
  6. F. Megawati, N. Mukminatien, and N. El Khoiri, "When no school is open for learning: does virtual teaching practice meet EFL pre-service teachers’ need?," in 4th English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2021, pp. 175–182. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2021.
  7. T. Y. Ardiyansah, "Pre-service teachers’ perceived readiness in teaching online in international internship program," Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 90–102, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.22219/CELTIC.V8I1.16456.
  8. Y. Turgut, "A comparison of pre-service, in-service and formation program for teachers’ perceptions of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in English language teaching (ELT)," Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1091–1106, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.5897/ERR2017.3311.
  9. H. C. Chuang, V. Gunawan, W. C. Wu, and K. L. Chuang, "Using thematic English learning and augmented reality to enhance vocabulary learning motivation and enjoyment of elementary school students," Proceedings - 2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2022, pp. 256–258, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00083.
  10. T. Grzegorczyk, R. Sliwinski, and J. Kaczmarek, "Attractiveness of augmented reality to consumers," Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1257–1269, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2019.1603368.
  11. C. Pribeanu, A. Balog, and D. D. Iordache, "Measuring the perceived quality of an AR-based learning application: a multidimensional model," Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 482–495, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2016.1143375.
  12. H. K. Wu, S. W. Y. Lee, H. Y. Chang, and J. C. Liang, "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education," Comput. Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41–49, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.10.024.
  13. M. Akçayır and G. Akçayır, "Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature," Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 20, pp. 1–11, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.EDUREV.2016.11.002.
  14. N. Alalwan, L. Cheng, H. Al-Samarraie, R. Yousef, A. Ibrahim Alzahrani, and S. M. Sarsam, "Challenges and prospects of virtual reality and augmented reality utilization among primary school teachers: A developing country perspective," Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 66, p. 100876, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2020.100876.
  15. H. Duan, X. Min, Y. Zhu, G. Zhai, X. Yang, and P. Le Callet, "Confusing image quality assessment: Toward better augmented reality experience," IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 31, pp. 7206–7221, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3220404.
  16. H. Duan, L. Guo, W. Sun, X. Min, L. Chen, and G. Zhai, "Augmented reality image quality assessment based on visual confusion theory," in IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting, BMSB, vol. 2022-June, 2022, doi: 10.1109/BMSB55706.2022.9828671.
  17. Y. Huang, H. Li, and R. Fong, "Using augmented reality in early art education: a case study in Hong Kong kindergarten," Int. J. Art Des. Educ., vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 879–894, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1080/03004430.2015.1067888.
  18. M. F. Abrar, M. R. Islam, M. S. Hossain, M. Islam, and M. A. Kabir, "Augmented reality in education: A study on preschool children, parents, and teachers in Bangladesh," in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11575 LNCS, pp. 217–229, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-21565-1_14
  19. A. Cascales, D. Pérez-López, and M. Contero, "Study on parent's acceptance of the augmented reality use for preschool education," Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 25, pp. 420–427, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/J.PROCS.2013.11.053.
  20. E. Solak and R. Cakir, "Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners’ vocabulary learning," J. Educators Online, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 50–72, Jul. 2015.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.