Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Philosophy. Psychology. Religion

Vol 7 (2022): December

Employee Job Satisfaction at SMEs
Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan pada UMKM



(*) Corresponding Author
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.7.2022.5529
Published
December 31, 2022

Abstract

This study is intended to explain how job satisfaction on UD Bumbu Masak Machmudah, Sidoarjo. In this research, the writer uses descriptive quantitative method using a single variable. The number of samples in this study were 135 respondents. The respondents in this study were all UD. Bumbu Masak Machmudah The sampling technique in this study used a saturated sampling technique to obtain research data. In collecting data, the authors distributed questionnaires to respondents and also interviews. In proving and analyzing this, validity and reliability tests, descriptive tests, and Crosstabs tests are used. The test results show that 17.8% of which 24 employees prove that employee job satisfaction is high, and the highest aspect of job satisfaction is the compensation aspect, which is 15.2%. And there is no difference between the job satisfaction of male and female employees and there is a difference between job satisfaction for employees with elementary, middle, and high school graduates.

Highlights:

  • The study focuses on job satisfaction in UD Bumbu Masak Machmudah, Sidoarjo, using a descriptive quantitative method with a single variable.
  • A sample size of 135 respondents was chosen through saturated sampling, and data was collected through questionnaires and interviews.
  • The test results indicate that 17.8% of employees have high job satisfaction, with the compensation aspect being the most significant. There is no gender difference in job satisfaction, but differences are observed based on educational background.

Keywords: job satisfaction, UD Bumbu Masak Machmudah, descriptive quantitative method, sample size, compensation aspect.

References

  1. Abidin, N. “Pengaruh kepuasan, motivasi dan kedisiplinan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawaidilingkungan kantor wilayah departemen agama provinsi jawa tengah”.Semarang: UniversitasDian Nuswantoro. 2010.
  2. Alwisol. Psikologi Kepribadian. Edisi revisi. UMM Press, Malang Analisa Permatasari. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap KinerjaKaryawan Pada PT. Octa Putrajaya Tekstil Mills. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat,Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya. 2011.
  3. Subagyo, Amir. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Komitmen Oganisasional Dosen Politeknik Negeri Semarang.Orbith. Vol. 10 No. 1 http://www.polines.ac.id/orbith/files/Orbith_10-1- 2014_Hal_74-81.pdf Diakses Tanggal 10 Februari 2020. Hal. 74-81. Subagyo, Amir. 2014. Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Self Efficacy Terhadap Komitmen Oganisasional Dosen Politeknik Negeri Semarang.Orbith. Vol. 10 No. 1 http://www.polines.ac.id/orbith/files/Orbith_10-1- 2014_Hal_74-81.pdf Diakses Tanggal 10 Februari 2020. Hal. 74-81. 2014.
  4. Analisa Permatasari, Pengaruh Lingkungan Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap KinerjaKaryawan Pada PT. Octa Putrajaya Tekstil Mills. Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat,Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya. 2011.
  5. Cintia, E. & Gilang, A., “Pengaruh lingkungan kerja fisik dan nonfisik terhadap kinerjakaryawan pada kppn bandung”.Jurnal Sosioteknologi, Vol. 15, No 1, 15(1). 2016.
  6. Dinprindag Provinsi Jawa Tengah. 2017. Logo, Visi dan Misi Dinas Perindustrian danPerdaganagn Provinsi Jawa Tengah.http://www.dinprindag.jatengprov.go.id , diakses pada25 Agustus 2020.
  7. Engko, C. Pengaruh Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Individual dengan Self Esteem dan Self Efficacy Sebagai Variable Intervening. Jurnal Bisnis dan akuntansi. Vol 10 No 1 Universitas Pattimura. http://web.stietrisakti.ac.id/JBA/JBA10.1April2008/1_Artikel_JBA10.1April2008.pdf . Diakses Tanggal 5 Februari 2020. Hal.1-12. Hasibuan, M.2006. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. 2006.
  8. Fasial. “ Pengaruh Insentif dan Fasilitas Kerja terhadap Produktivitas Kerja”. Yogyakarta:FE-UGM. 2005.
  9. Ghozali, Imam. “Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS”. Semarang: BadanPenerbit Universitas Diponegoro. 2011.
  10. Hariandja, Marihot Tua Efendi. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Pengadaan,Pengembangan, Pengkompensasian, dan Peningkatan Produktivitas Pegawai. Jakarta:Grasindo.Hayati, W.F., 2014. “Pengaruh Motivasi, Lingkungan Kerja Dan Fasilitas Terhadap KinerjaKaryawan Pt. Radio Suara Singgalang Mahimbau (Radio Sushi Fm) Padang”.Jurnal Online.Haynes, B.P., 2008. “The impact of office comfort on productivity The impact of office comfort onproductivity”.Journal of Facilities Management. 2002.
  11. Hasibuan, M.Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta. 2006.
  12. Hasibuan , Malayu S.P. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.. 2002.
  13. Indrasari, Meithiana. Kepuasan Kerja Dan Kinerja Karyawan. Pertama. Sidoarjo: Indomedia Pustaka. 2017.
  14. Kilapong, Samuel, Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Self Effiacy, Self Esteem Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepusan Kerja Karyawan PT Tropica Cocoprima Manado. Jurnal Emba. Vol.1 No.4 Desember 2013. Universitas Sam Ratulangi Manado. http://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/emba/article/viewFile/2645/ 2198 Diakses Tanggal 8 Februari 2020. Hal.141-150. 2013.
  15. K, Awaludin., Alam, S. & Yusuf, R.M., “Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Peningkatan KinerjaPegawai Pada Badan Busat Statistik Kabupaten Maros”. Jurnal MagisterManajemen.Makasar:Universitas Hasanuddin. 2013.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.