Login
Section Business and Economics

Student Consumptive Behavior Rises With Fintech and Declines With Financial Management

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): December:

Fatimah Nurjannati Iskandar (1), Keni Kaniawati (2), Titin Kartini (3)

(1) Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
(3) Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Manajemen, Universitas Widyatama, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: Digital financial services have become closely linked to student consumption patterns in the era of technology based transactions. Specific Background: Students at Sali Al Aitaam University use financial technology within a social environment shaped by digital media, instant lifestyles, and personal financial decision making. Knowledge Gap: The study addresses the need to examine how financial technology and financial management relate to consumptive behavior among vocational faculty students. Aims: This study aimed to determine the relationship between financial technology, financial management, and consumptive behavior using a quantitative survey of 60 students selected through simple random sampling and analyzed with SPSS version 21.0. Results: Financial technology and financial management simultaneously showed a significant relationship with consumptive behavior, with an F value of 137.670 and significance below 0.001. Financial technology showed a positive coefficient of 0.867, while financial management showed a negative coefficient of -0.689. The model produced an R value of 0.910 and an R Square of 0.828, indicating that both variables explained 82.8% of consumptive behavior, while 17.2% was related to factors outside the study. Novelty: The study positions fintech use and financial management as contrasting predictors of student consumptive behavior in the same regression model. Implications: The findings indicate the importance of strengthening financial management awareness while recognizing how fintech convenience can intensify consumptive tendencies.


Highlights:



  • Combined predictors explained 82.8% of variance.

  • Digital transaction use showed a positive coefficient.

  • Money management showed a negative coefficient.


Keywords: Consumptive Behavior, Financial Literacy, Financial Management, Financial Technology


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Dedi, A. S. Hendrayana, E. Erisyani, and N. Setiana, “Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa S1 PGSD Masukan Sarjana di UPBJJ UT Bandung,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2019, doi: 10.3390/jpd14080163.

Famahato, “Mahasiswa adalah Pelajar Perguruan Tinggi,” Educ: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2022, doi: 10.19184/ejp.v12i1.52890.

A. Millah, M. Muslikhati, and A. L. Hakim, “Perubahan Pola Konsumsi Gen Z sebagai Dampak Digitalisasi Ekonomi,” e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.19184/ejeba.v12i1.52840.

A. Millah, M. Muslikhati, and L. A. Hakim, “Perubahan Pola Konsumsi Gen Z sebagai Dampak Digitalisasi Ekonomi: The Impact of Economic Digitalization in Consumption Patterns for Gen Z,” e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 2025, doi: 10.24235/jy.v8i1.9341.

U. N. Kusaini, Kusumawati, and Nurhasanah, “Dinamika Kepekaan Sosial Mahasiswa Generasi Z di Era Digital: Studi Analisis di Lingkungan Kampus,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bimbingan dan Konseling Undana, 2024, doi: 10.24235/bku.v8i1.9341.

S. P. Amini, M. Paniza, and T. Sutabri, “Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan Virtual Reality terhadap Inovasi Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Generasi Z,” Nusantara Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 2024, doi: 10.19184/njm.v12i1.52840.

T. P. Rahmasari, “Pergeseran Makna Hedonisme Epicurus di Kalangan Generasi Millenial,” Jurnal Yaqzhan: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan, 2022, doi: 10.24235/jy.v8i1.9341.

R. Razali, “Perilaku Konsumen: Hedonisme dalam Perspektif Islam,” Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, Akuntansi dan Perbankan, vol. 4, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.52490/jeskape.v4i1.774.

S. Balta, E. Emirtekin, K. Kircaburun, and M. D. Griffiths, “Neuroticism, Trait Fear of Missing Out, and Phubbing: The Mediating Role of State Fear of Missing Out and Problematic Instagram Use,” International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 628–639, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11469-018-9959-8.

A. Japutra, S. Gordon-Wilson, Y. Ekinci, and E. D. Adams, “The Dark Side of Brands: Exploring Fear of Missing Out, Obsessive Brand Passion, and Compulsive Buying,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 183, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114990.

C. N. Safitri and M. Husnaini, “Dampak Gaya Hidup Hedonisme dengan Perilaku Konsumtif pada Mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Agama Islam Universitas Islam Indonesia,” At-Thullab: Jurnal Mahasiswa Studi Islam, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.20885/tullab.vol7.iss1.art2.

A. K. Przybylski, K. Murayama, C. R. DeHaan, and V. Gladwell, “Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1841–1848, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014.

M. Kaddouhah, “An Economic Definition of ‘Fear of Missing Out’ (FOMO),” Finance Research Letters, vol. 67, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2024.105344.

K. K. Katsaros, “Gen Z Employee Adaptive Performance: The Role of Inclusive Leadership and Workplace Happiness,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 14, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.3390/admsci14080163.

A. F. Z. Haqiqi and T. K. Pertiwi, “Pengaruh Financial Technology, Literasi Keuangan dan Sikap Keuangan terhadap Perilaku Keuangan Generasi Z di Era Pandemi Covid-19 pada Mahasiswa UPN ‘Veteran’ Jawa Timur,” SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, vol. 5, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.19184/jms.v12i1.52840.