Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Login


Academia Open

 Submit manuscript
Section Engineering

Woven Bag Production Productivity Fluctuated Across OMAX Criteria


Produktivitas Produksi Tas Anyaman Berfluktuasi Berdasarkan Kriteria OMAX
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): December:
DOI : https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.14058
Published : Jul 20, 2026

Sadewa Sadewa (1), Enny Aryanny (2)

(1) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: Manufacturing companies must monitor productivity to maintain operational competitiveness. Specific Background: PT XYZ experienced declining woven bag output from 46,005,186 pieces in 2024 to 42,833,617 pieces in 2025. Knowledge Gap: Prior productivity studies often focused only on measurement, while integrated evaluation and improvement formulation remained limited. Aims: This study analyzes woven bag production productivity using OMAX supported by AHP, Traffic Light System, fishbone diagram, and 5W+1H. Results: The study used production data from January to December 2025. Productivity fluctuated, with the highest value in October at 685.60 and the lowest in June at 115.00. AHP showed labor as the most influential criterion with a weight of 22.70%. Traffic Light System results showed many criteria remained in the red category, especially machine working hours. Novelty: The study combines OMAX, AHP, TLS, fishbone, and 5W+1H for a more comprehensive productivity evaluation. Implications: PT XYZ should improve raw material control, workforce performance, machine utilization, and defect reduction.


Highlights:



  • October recorded the highest index score.

  • June showed the weakest production performance.

  • Workforce criteria received the largest priority weight.


Keywords:  5W+1H, AHP, Fishbone Diagram, Objective Matrix (OMAX), Productivity, Traffic Light System.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Yandi, “Literature Review Model Produktivitas Karyawan: Motivasi, Lingkungan Kerja, dan Kompensasi,” Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, vol. 1, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.38035/jim.v1i1.

S. Haniyah and D. Ernawati, “Analisis Pengukuran Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) dan Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) di PT XYZ,” Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Teknologi, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2023, doi: 10.33005/juminten.v4i2.650.

E. Herlina, F. H. E. Prabowo, and D. Nuraida, “Analisis Pengendalian Mutu dalam Meningkatkan Proses Produksi,” Jurnal Fokus Manajemen Bisnis, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 173, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.12928/fokus.v11i2.4263.

H. Effendy, B. R. Machmoed, and A. Rasyid, “Pengukuran dan Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) (Studi Kasus: PDAM Kabupaten Gorontalo),” Jambura Industrial Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.37905/jirev.v1i1.10066.

H. Effendy, B. R. Machmoed, and A. Rasyid, “Pengukuran dan Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) (Studi Kasus: di PDAM Kabupaten Gorontalo),” Jambura Industrial Review, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–46, May 2021.

M. H. B. Sembiring, W. N. AK, and T. Hernawati, “Analisis Pengukuran Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) pada Proses Produksi Air Minum di PT Tirta Investama Langkat,” Blend Sains Jurnal Teknik, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 268–285, May 2025, doi: 10.56211/blendsains.v3i3.810.

N. S. Kamila and F. Fahma, “Analisis Produktivitas Proses Produksi Gondorukem Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) di PT XYZ,” Performa: Media Ilmiah Teknik Industri, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 11, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.20961/performa.22.1.67653.

A. R. Mukti, Q. A’yun, and S. Suparto, “Analisis Produktivitas Menggunakan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) (Studi Kasus: Departemen Produksi PT Elang Jagad),” Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–18, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.31284/j.jtm.2021.v2i1.1525.

A. J. Nugroho, Tinjauan Produktivitas dari Sudut Pandang Ergonomi. Padang, Indonesia: PACE, 2021.

Sutanto, D. Amiruddin, and G. Nugraha, “Rancang Bangun Aplikasi Skrining Kesehatan Mental Remaja Berbasis Web di RSUD Dr. Dradjat Prawiranegara dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Jurnal Innovation and Future Technology, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.47080/iftech.v4i1.1813.

A. H. N. Ajijah, Y. Khoerunnisa, D. K. Hidayanto, and R. Rosid, “Peran Motivasi terhadap Produktivitas Karyawan (Literature Review),” Jurnal Publisitas, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.37858/publisitas.v8i1.56.

F. Firza, M. Zakaria, and Trisna, “Evaluasi Kinerja Pemasok dengan Pendekatan Vendor Performance Indicator dan Traffic Light System di PT Ika Bina Agro Wisesa,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi, vol. 5, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.29103/sisfo.v5i2.6243.

R. Destalia and E. Aryanny, “Analisis Produktivitas pada Unit Produksi dengan Metode Objective Matrix (OMAX) di CV Serba Jaya Oke Surabaya,” Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 707–722, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.28926/briliant.v10i3.1911.

E. Aristriyana and R. A. Fauzi, “Analisis Penyebab Kecacatan Produk dengan Metode Fishbone Diagram dan Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) pada Perusahaan Elang Mas Sindang Kasih Ciamis,” Jurnal Industrial Galuh, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 75–85, 2022, doi: 10.25157/jig.v4i2.3021.

F. R. Sappa and A. Z. Al Faritsy, “Usulan Peningkatan Produktivitas Produksi Kain Batik di Batik Berkah Lestari,” vol. 12, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.34001/jdpt.v12i2.2093.

J. Tampubolon and A. C. Sembiring, Pengukuran Produktivitas dan Kinerja Perusahaan. Medan, Indonesia: UNPRI Press, 2023.