Mufida Nggolaon (1), Abdul Rahman (2), Nuraini Nuraini (3), Nurgan Tadeko (4), Roberto Rolly Bulalong (5)
General Background: Creativity is a fundamental 21st-century skill for elementary students, yet it remains relatively low due to teacher-centered learning practices. Specific Background: Observations in Grade 3 at SD Negeri 1 Tatura revealed limited student innovation, low confidence, and minimal active participation in problem-solving activities. Knowledge Gap: Previous studies largely focused on upper-grade students, used classroom action research, and rarely examined detailed subdimensions of creativity or specific school contexts. Aims: This study aims to examine the increase in student creativity through the implementation of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model using a quasi-experimental design with pretest-posttest control groups. Results: Findings show a significant difference between experimental and control groups (sig. 0.007 < 0.05), with higher posttest mean scores in the experimental class (49.42) than the control class (38.08). However, N-gain results indicate low overall improvement (0.2152) and uneven development across creativity indicators, with fluency categorized as high (0.7368), flexibility and elaboration as moderate (0.5538; 0.4985), and originality as low (0.1955). Novelty: This study applies a quantitative experimental approach focusing on Grade 3 students and analyzes creativity through detailed subdimensions within a specific school context. Implications: PBL supports increased student creativity but requires optimization, continuous guidance, and strategic implementation to ensure balanced development across all creativity indicators.
Highlights• Significant difference found between experimental and control group outcomes• Highest gain observed in idea generation compared to other dimensions• Uneven development identified across multiple creativity indicators
KeywordsProblem Based Learning; Student Creativity; Primary School; Quasi Experimental Design; Creative Thinking
[1] OECD, “PISA 2022 Results (Volume I and II) - Country Notes: Indonesia,” Dec. 4, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html
[2] OECD, PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools. Paris: OECD, 2024, doi: 10.1787/765ee8c2-en.
[3] Databoks, “Kemampuan sains pelajar Indonesia peringkat ke-6 ASEAN,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/infografik/2024/01/31/kemampuan-sains-pelajar-indonesia-peringkat-ke-6-asean
[4] R. I. Saenal, “Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas III melalui model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL),” vol. 10, 2025, doi: 10.23969/jp.v10i2.30014.
[5] N. Melihayatri, W. Fahira, B. Al Fajar, and N. Pratiwi, “Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa sekolah dasar melalui implementasi model Problem Based Learning,” Jurnal Kiprah Pendidikan, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2025, doi: 10.33578/kpd.v4i1.p32-41.
[6] A. Dewi, A. R. Firdaus, and L. H. Fasha, “Penggunaan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas V sekolah dasar,” COLLASE (Creative of Learning Students Elementary Education), vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 898–905, 2024, doi: 10.22460/collase.v7i5.24282.
[7] U. Subandi, A. Sutisnawati, and L. H. Maula, “Penggunaan model Problem Based Learning untuk meningkatkan kreativitas belajar siswa,” Jurnal Binagogik, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 166–179, 2023, doi: 10.61290/pgsd.v10i2.553.
[8] Z. Aslach, “Pengaruh kreativitas siswa dalam model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning terhadap prestasi belajar siswa kelas IV SDN Kalisari 01,” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 30, 2020, doi: 10.30659/pendas.7.1.30-43.
[9] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2023.
[10] Y. Sukestiyarno, N. L. D. Mashitoh, and W. Wardono, “Analysis of students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in module-assisted online learning in terms of self-efficacy,” Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 106–118, 2021, doi: 10.24815/jdm.v8i1.19898.
[11] R. Dewi, R. Gustiawati, and R. Afrinaldi, “Implementasi model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dalam pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani di SMA Negeri 4 Karawang,” Journal Coaching Education Sports, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2020, doi: 10.31599/jces.v1i2.327.
[12] I. Irawati, “Application of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) learning model improves students’ cooperation attitude,” Workshop Nasional Penguatan Kompetensi Guru Sekolah Dasar, vol. 3, pp. 2209–2215, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/shes
[13] D. Ariyanti, F. Budi, N. Cahyani, and N. Pratiwi, “Model PBL guna meningkatkan kreativitas siswa MI/SD dalam pembelajaran abad 21,” vol. 1, p. 27, 2023, doi: 10.15642/prokonpi.v1i1.39.
[14] A. Mayasari, O. Arifudin, and E. Juliawati, “Implementasi model Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam meningkatkan keaktifan pembelajaran,” Jurnal Tahsinia, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2022, doi: 10.57171/jt.v3i2.335.
[15] D. N. Qomariyah and H. Subekti, “Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif: studi eksplorasi siswa di SMPN 62 Surabaya,” PENSA E-JURNAL: Pendidikan Sains, vol. 9, pp. 242–246, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/index
[16] A. Dulyapit, Y. Supriatna, and F. Sumirat, “Application of the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model to improve student learning outcomes in class V at UPTD SD Negeri Tapos 5, Depok City,” Journal of Insan Mulia Education, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2023, doi: 10.59923