Eka Aprilia Salsabila (1), Sulhatul Habibah (2), Zuli Dwi Rahmawati (3)
General Background Mathematics learning in elementary schools plays a crucial role in developing logical thinking and problem-solving skills; however, it is often dominated by procedural exercises. Specific Background In the context of learning the greatest common factor (FPB) in class V MI Ma’arif NU Sukolilo, teaching practices remain focused on lectures and written tasks, limiting students’ conceptual understanding and numeracy literacy. Knowledge Gap This condition indicates a gap between concept-oriented mathematics learning and the conventional instructional practices that do not sufficiently engage students in contextual and meaningful experiences. Aims This study aims to describe the implementation of the FPB Fun Day co-curricular program and analyze its role in improving numeracy skills, FPB conceptual understanding, and numeracy literacy. Results Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the findings reveal that FPB Fun Day is implemented through contextual activities such as distributing objects evenly, increasing student participation, conceptual comprehension, and the ability to interpret and communicate mathematical problems. Students with higher abilities tend to apply conventional strategies, while those with difficulties benefit more from contextual approaches. Novelty The study introduces a co-curricular, experience-based learning model integrating FPB concepts with numeracy literacy through real-life activities beyond classroom routines. Implications The findings suggest that contextual and activity-based learning can serve as an alternative strategy for strengthening conceptual understanding and numeracy literacy, supported by teacher creativity, student engagement, and institutional support despite challenges in time management and varying student abilities.
• Contextual activities using real objects support deeper mathematical reasoning• Learners with lower abilities gain clearer understanding through visual practice• Collaborative tasks promote active participation and logical problem solving
FPB Fun Day; Mathematics Learning; Numeracy Literacy; Conceptual Understanding; Contextual Learning
[1] L. D. Newton, “Teaching for understanding in primary science,” Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 143–153, 2001, doi: 10.1080/09500790108666992.
[2] Lestari, “Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti || 75,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. citra Bakti, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 2024.
[3] D. F. Himmawan and D. Juandi, “Games based learning in mathematics education,” Union J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2023, doi: 10.30738/union.v11i1.13982.
[4] A. Susanto, Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
[5] U. L. N. Latifah, H. Wakhyudin, and F. Cahyadi, “Miskonsepsi penyelesaian soal cerita matematika materi FPB dan KPK sekolah dasar,” J. Ris. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181–195, 2020.
[6] Ramadhan Dwi Ardianzah and Nuhyal Ulia, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Digital Math Smart Materi KPK FPB Kelas V Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. QOSIM J. Pendidik. Sos. Hum., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 396–405, 2025, doi: 10.61104/jq.v3i1.844.
[7] E. Isnaintri and N. Novaliyosi, “Systematic literature study on numeracy literacy activities: How to implement it,” Union J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 48–66, 2024, doi: 10.30738/union.v12i1.16608.
[8] M. Dewi, M. Madonna, and I. Keguruan, “FLORES TIMUR,” vol. 6, pp. 618–628, 2025.
[9] N. P. M. Tagan, K. Karmila, F. Basir, and S. Pawenang, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Dan Numerasi Matematika,” Pedagog. J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 894–913, 2025, doi: 10.30605/pedagogy.v10i2.6907.
[10] T. Firanti, W. Krismanto, and K. Hasan, “JUARA SD : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar Volume 4 Nomor 3 November 2025 Penerapan Fun Learning untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas V UPTD SDN 12 Parepare,” vol. 4, no. November, pp. 246–249, 2025.
[11] C. Maryam, R. Heryani, and K. Kunci, “Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development Improving primary school numeracy literacy through play interventions and home-school partnerships,” Curricula J. Curric. Dev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 329–340, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17509/curricula.v4i1.82024https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/CURRICULA/
[12] I. Nur Rahman and A. Nurzaman, “Implementasi Kebijakan Retribusi Jasa Umum Penyelenggaraan Transportasi Bidang Perparkiran Pada Dinas Perhubungan Kota Tasikmalaya,” J. Pendidik. Indones. Teor. Penelitian, dan Inov., vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.59818/jpi.v3i1.438.
[13] Nurul Maulidya and Muhammad Hafidz, “Kompetensi Guru Bahasa Arab Dalam Pemanfaatan Teknologi Pembelajaran Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab,” BARA AJI J. Keilmuan Bhs. Arab dan Pengajarannya, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 23–41, 2024, doi: 10.52185/baraaji.v2i01.470.
[14] I. R. Hidayah, C. Sa’dijah, L. Anwar, Yerizon, and I. M. Arnawa, “Empowering students’ numeracy skills: Mathematics teachers’ perceptions regarding the effectiveness and challenges of Indonesian national curriculum and the programs – A mixed method study,” Infin. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 163–188, 2025, doi: 10.22460/infinity.v14i1.p163-188.
[15] N. E. C. Rahma Aulia Arief, Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Ponorogo: Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia, 2019.
[16] Putri Adinda Pratiwi, Fahima Mashalani, Maulia Hafizhah, Azra Batrisyia Sabrina, Nur Hapsi Harahap, and Deasy Yunita Siregar, “Mengungkap Metode Observasi Yang Efektif Menurut Pra-Pengajar EFL,” Mutiara J. Penelit. dan Karya Ilm., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 133–149, 2023, doi: 10.59059/mutiara.v2i1.877.
[17] N. Yasin, I. Khalid, and S. Rashid, “Effects of Co-Curricular Activities on Academic Performance of Elementary School Students,” J. Heal. Rehabil. Res., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 159–163, 2024, doi: 10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.747.
[18] M. S. Ummah, “Metode Pengumpulan Data Kualitatif,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019.
[19] Nadia Adiningrat and Meyniar Albina, “Penerapan Model Pendekatan Deskriptif dalam Penelitian Pendidikan,” QAZI J. Islam. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 196–204, 2025, doi: 10.61104/qz.v2i1.275.