Login
Section Magister Management

Self-Paced Moodle Learning Advances Teachers Digital Competence Levels


Pembelajaran Mandiri Moodle Meningkatkan Tingkat Kompetensi Digital Guru
Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): June :

Hafizh Fajar Rajab (1), Edah Jubaedah (2), Hendrikus T. Gedeona (3), Hafid Aditya Pradesa Pradesa (4)

(1) Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pembangunan Negara, Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pembangunan Negara, Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia
(3) Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pembangunan Negara, Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia
(4) Program Studi Magister Administrasi Pembangunan Negara, Politeknik STIA LAN Bandung, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: Digital competence has become a fundamental requirement for effective pedagogy in technology-integrated education systems. Specific Background: At SMAN 1 Nagreg, teachers’ use of digital tools remained limited, with most operating at the Newcomer and Explorer levels of the DigCompEdu framework and relying on conventional professional development approaches. Knowledge Gap: Empirical action research on self-paced e-learning models for secondary school teachers in resource-constrained settings remains limited, particularly regarding structured and iterative interventions. Aims: This study evaluates a Moodle-based self-paced e-learning program designed using the ADDIE framework within Classroom Action Research to improve teachers’ digital competencies across six DigCompEdu domains. Results: Findings indicate a transition from A1/A2 levels to the Integrator (B1) level, with notable progress in legal digital resource curation and interactive digital assessment practices. Teachers reported a 79.05% positive response rate, emphasizing flexibility as a key advantage, while time management remained a primary challenge. Novelty: The study demonstrates the integration of CAR and ADDIE within a self-paced Moodle environment as a structured intervention model for teacher professional development. Implications: Institutional support, including formal policy integration and protected learning time, is essential to sustain competency development and ensure broader adoption of self-paced digital training.


Highlights
• Transition from beginner to integrator competency stages across all DigCompEdu domains
• Strong progression in ethical resource selection and data-driven evaluation practices
• Flexible access model widely appreciated despite workload-related participation barriers


Keywords
Digital Competency; DigCompEdu Framework; Moodle Learning Platform; Self-Paced Learning; Teacher Professional Development

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. Redecker, "European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu," Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Rep. EUR 28775 EN, 2017.

[2] R. A. Swanson and E. F. Holton, Foundations of Human Resource Development, 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2022.

[3] Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen, 2005.

[4] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru, 2007.

[5] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, 2016.

[6] SMAN 1 Nagreg, "Rapor Pendidikan SMAN 1 Nagreg Tahun 2025," Bandung Regency, Internal Report, 2025.

[7] A. Bates, Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning for a digital age. Vancouver, BC: Tony Bates Associates Ltd, 2015.

[8] M. G. Moore, "Theory of transactional distance," in Handbook of Distance Education, M. G. Moore, Ed. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.

[9] M. S. Knowles, The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Company, 1984.

[10] M. Dougiamas and P. Taylor, "Moodle: Using Learning Communities to Create an Open Source Course Management System," in Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2003 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Honolulu, HI, 2003, pp. 171-178.

[11] S. Kemmis and R. McTaggart, The Action Research Planner, 3rd ed. Geelong, Vic: Deakin University Press, 1988.

[12] J. D. Kirkpatrick and W. K. Kirkpatrick, Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press, 2016.

[13] SMAN 1 Nagreg, "Kurikulum Satuan Pendidikan (KOSP) SMAN 1 Nagreg Tahun Pelajaran 2024/2025," Bandung Regency, school document, 2025.

[14] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[15] M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994.

[16] R. C. Clark and R. E. Mayer, E-learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 4th ed. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2020.

[17] M. Fullan, The New Meaning of Educational Change, 5th ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, 2016.