Tareq Abbas Jasim (1)
General Background: Resource-dependent economies face persistent challenges in achieving sustainable growth and economic diversification. Specific Background: Iraq’s economy is characterized by heavy reliance on oil revenues, weak non-oil sectors, and fiscal imbalances that constrain long-term development. Knowledge Gap: Despite numerous fiscal reforms, limited evidence explains why diversification outcomes remain weak within Iraq’s public revenue and expenditure framework. Aims: This study examines fiscal policy instruments, public revenue composition, and their role in supporting economic diversification in Iraq. Results: The findings indicate that oil revenues dominate total public revenues, while non-oil sectors contribute marginally to gross domestic product, reflecting structural imbalances and inefficient public spending patterns. Novelty: The study provides an integrated analysis of fiscal, sectoral, and institutional factors shaping diversification outcomes in the Iraqi economy. Implications: The results highlight the need for balanced fiscal policies and stronger support for productive sectors to reduce oil dependency and promote economic stability.
Keywords: Fiscal Policy, Economic Diversification, Public Revenues, Oil Dependency, Iraqi Economy
Key Findings Highlights:
Public revenues in Iraq remain highly concentrated in the oil sector.
Non-oil productive sectors contribute weakly to economic structure.
Fiscal imbalances limit progress toward diversification goals.
The fiscal policy is considered one of the main pillars of macroeconomic policy. It bears the responsibility of organizing the financial framework through its tools—namely public expenditures and revenues—in order to achieve all desired economic objectives and ensure stability. Accordingly, fiscal policies occupy a crucial position within macroeconomic policies, as they represent the other side of economic activity. The paths taken by both the financial and real sectors are expected to move in harmony to achieve economic stability and avoid creating inflationary or deflationary trends, especially when one sector lags behind the other. In Iraq, fiscal policy plays a central role in the allocation and distribution of financial resources based on the needs and requirements of the national economy. This contributes to the provision of essential services, both from an economic and social perspective.
The Importance of the Research
The importance of this research lies in the role of fiscal policy in Iraq in diversifying income sources and reducing dependence on a single rentier resource (the oil sector). This dependence poses economic and financial risks that threaten the economy, hindering diversification and impacting financial resources, especially given the crucial role of oil prices in determining Iraq's financial future.
The Research Problem
For decades, the Iraqi economy has suffered from near-total reliance on oil revenues as its primary source of national income, making it vulnerable to economic and financial risks stemming from fluctuations in global oil prices. After 2003, despite the economic and political transformations the country has undergone, the implemented fiscal policies have not been clearly successful in achieving the desired economic diversification.
The Research Hypothesis
Fiscal policy in Iraq after 2003 has had a limited and ineffective impact on diversifying income sources due to excessive reliance on oil revenues and the weak direction of public spending and investment towards non-oil sectors. Research Objective
This research aims to analyze the effectiveness of fiscal policy in Iraq after 2003 in achieving diversification of national income sources, by studying fiscal policy tools (such as public spending and public revenues), identifying the obstacles facing the economic diversification process, and proposing ways to enhance the role of fiscal policy in supporting non-oil sectors and achieving sustainable development.
Section One
Fiscal Policy (Concept and Tools)
The emergence of financial thought is largely linked to the rise of governmental systems when a public body assumes the management and regulation of a country's financial affairs. This aims to regulate the relationships between all economic activities and sectors, on the one hand, and the individuals within society, on the other, and the resulting transactions and exchanges. Interest in studying societal financial matters has been largely tied to the extent of government intervention in managing economic, social, and political affairs. This intervention did not occur on a large scale until modern times, serving as a starting point for developing new and modern perspectives on addressing various crises and achieving economic stability. This necessitates the design and implementation of macroeconomic policies, including fiscal policy, to address the causes of imbalances and their impact on GDP and employment.
First Requirement: The Concept of Fiscal Policy:
The concept of fiscal policy varies according to different historical periods and economic, intellectual, and social conditions. One such definition describes it as "a set of measures taken by the government through changes in its spending or taxation levels to have a comprehensive impact on the economy in general, in order to achieve specific objectives, including price stability, full employment, and economic growth." [1].Fiscal policy is also defined as a mechanism that links government revenues and expenditures, designed to address economic fluctuations, reduce or eliminate unemployment and inflation rates, and ultimately achieve economic growth[2].
Fiscal policy may be expansionary when the goal is to stimulate aggregate demand, as is the case during recessions. In this situation, the government may employ one of the following policies: a deficit spending policy, a deficit without spending policy, or a spending policy without a deficit. Conversely, during periods of economic boom leading to inflation, the government may adopt a contractionary fiscal policy, which essentially involves implementing the aforementioned policies.[3] The concept of fiscal policy refers to the relationship between government spending and revenues, which it uses to counter economic fluctuations in order to reduce or eliminate unemployment and inflation rates, as well as to achieve sustainable and manageable economic growth [4].
After reviewing the preceding concepts, fiscal policy can be defined as a set of measures employed by the government, specifically the Ministry of Finance, aimed at achieving economic stability. It is a tool at the disposal of the state, enabling it to utilize revenues and expenditures to achieve specific objectives, including developing and advancing the national economy, addressing inflation and recession, and redistributing income and wealth among members of society.
Second Requirement: Tools of Fiscal Policy
Fiscal policy is considered one of the most important tools used by the government to achieve economic stability and stimulate growth. It encompasses decisions related to public revenues (such as fees and taxes) and public expenditures. Through this policy, the state seeks to influence aggregate demand levels and guide the economy towards goals such as increasing production, reducing unemployment, and controlling inflation.
First: Public Government Spending
This refers to the spending program that aligns with the nature of the state in various economic, social, and political aspects of life. It aims to address the expenditures of the government and its affiliated local bodies. The evolution of public spending reflects the development of the state and its responsibility towards achieving economic stability and the consequent availability of the right conditions that lead to economic development and social justice in countries around the world [5].
Second: Public Revenues:
These are the cash amounts that the state receives from its public bodies, whether economic or sovereign revenues, which enter the state treasury permanently and are neither refundable nor divisible, and are intended to finance public spending [6].
Third: Taxes:
Taxes are among the most important tools of fiscal policy because they are a significant source of public revenue that flows into the state treasury. A tax is defined as a sum of money that individuals are legally obligated to pay to the state or one of its agencies as a final contribution to public expenses, without any private benefit in return for paying that tax. Taxes are divided into direct taxes, such as income tax and capital gains tax, which are levied on individuals, and indirect taxes, such as sales taxes and production taxes. Taxes affect the volume of economic activity, increasing or decreasing it according to the prevailing conditions of the national economy[2].
Public debt is a modern tool used in fiscal policy. It is an integral part of fiscal policy, whether it is domestic or international debt. Modern fiscal theory emphasizes the legitimacy of deficit financing for the general budget. It also contributes to financing productive projects and driving economic development. Therefore, it is a tool capable of guiding economic activity, provided that this debt is used appropriately[7].
Iraq witnessed profound political and economic transformations after 2003, which directly impacted its financial and economic structure. The political change led to a comprehensive restructuring of state institutions, including the financial system, posing significant challenges for policymakers in formulating and implementing an effective fiscal policy that responds to the new realities. Despite the availability of oil resources, which constitute the primary source of public revenue, fiscal policy in Iraq faced numerous difficulties, including excessive reliance on oil revenues, weak economic diversification, and escalating rates of corruption and financial mismanagement.
The importance of studying the reality of fiscal policy in Iraq after 2003 stems from the growing need for deep financial and structural reforms aimed at achieving economic stability, ensuring equitable resource distribution, and enhancing the efficiency of public spending. Furthermore, the challenges that accompanied this period, such as security and political crises and fluctuating oil prices, necessitate an analysis of the implemented fiscal policies, identifying shortcomings and proposing solutions.
The first requirement: The main challenges facing fiscal policy in Iraq after 2003
Iraq after 2003 witnessed significant political and economic transformations that directly impacted the management of financial and economic affairs. Political changes, accompanied by security and structural instability, contributed to a complex environment in which fiscal policy faced considerable challenges. While fiscal policy is a fundamental tool for achieving economic stability and stimulating development, Iraq encountered numerous difficulties in this area. These difficulties included near-total dependence on oil revenues, weak economic diversification, a growing budget deficit, widespread administrative and financial corruption, and a weak institutional framework. Furthermore, regional and international circumstances, along with internal challenges, affected the state's ability to formulate and implement effective fiscal policies.
First: Primarily Reliance on Oil Revenue:
Iraq is considered one of the most oil-dependent countries in the world. Over the past decade, oil revenues have constituted more than 99% of its exports, approximately 85% of its general budget revenues, and nearly 42% of its GDP. This excessive reliance on oil exposes the Iraqi economy to macroeconomic fluctuations. The decline in oil revenues, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, had a significant impact on GDP in 2020, which contracted by 15.7%. This decline in oil revenues also led to a substantial decrease in public spending, particularly investment spending, further exacerbating the contraction of the Iraqi economy in 2020[8].
Second: The State Budget Deficit
The Iraqi economy is exposed to factors such as economic recession, tax evasion, and flawed demographic, political, and financial policies that lead to public expenditures exceeding public revenues, resulting in a state budget deficit. Below is a table showing the surplus and deficit during the period from 2004 to 2020.
Source: Official website of the Central Bank of Iraq
As shown in the table above:
Third: Weakness of the Tax System
The tax system generally suffers from weak revenues, as well as a lack of diversity in tax bases in most developing countries, including Iraq. This is due to the numerous challenges and obstacles facing the implementation of tax policy as a component of the budget and a tool for stimulating economic growth and stability in Iraq. Therefore, there are several obstacles and reasons that lead to the weakness of the tax system in Iraq, including: [9]-
The second requirement: Policies and implementation methods
Administrative and operational policies are an essential part of any organization or business entity, as they define the general framework within which operations are managed and decisions are made. These policies aim to ensure the efficient and effective achievement of strategic objectives, adherence to regulations and laws, and the promotion of good governance.
Implementation methods refer to the mechanisms and procedures followed to implement these policies in practice. These methods include developing implementation plans, defining responsibilities, and establishing monitoring and evaluation standards to ensure compliance and address any deviations. Understanding the complementary relationship between policies and implementation methods is key to ensuring improved institutional performance, providing the highest quality services, and enhancing the satisfaction of both beneficiaries and employees.
First: Tax system reform
The tax system is a fundamental pillar of any national economy, as it constitutes the primary tool upon which the state relies to finance its public expenditures and achieve its economic and social objectives. To develop and reform the tax system in Iraq, there are a number of procedures, which are: [4]
Second: Combating Administrative and Financial Corruption:
Administrative corruption can take many forms, such as bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, favoritism, forgery, abuse of political influence, arbitrary decision-making in processing transactions, leaking sensitive information, neglecting and misusing public funds, and extorting citizens and residents by imposing fictitious fees to facilitate administrative transactions. This corruption varies in its levels; it may appear through a corrupt employee in a ministry who accepts bribes, for example, or it may extend to an entire department involved in administrative crimes through the collusion of the director with his subordinates[10].
Administrative corruption can be combated through a set of measures, which are:[11]
Third: Adopting a Program and Performance Budget
A program and performance budget is a type of budget that aims to link public expenditures to specific objectives. Through it, the objectives to be achieved are defined, and the amount of expenditures required to implement the programs planned for inclusion in the budget is estimated, with the goal of achieving those objectives. This budget also includes setting objective standards and metrics that help measure the extent of program implementation and evaluate its efficiency and performance.
The US Economic Development Commission defined program and performance budgeting as a set of methods that enable program managers to focus precisely on implementing the objectives within their responsibilities, with the ability to compare progress in achieving these objectives in terms of working hours, materials used, and time[12].
Section Three: Fiscal Policy Mechanisms in Iraq for Diversifying Income Sources
Diversifying income sources is a strategic objective pursued by all countries with rentier economies, such as Iraq, to reduce their excessive dependence on the oil sector. Since 2003, Iraqi fiscal policy has faced significant challenges in this area due to political instability, weak institutions, and the absence of a clear economic vision. With the recurring crises resulting from fluctuating global oil prices, the urgent need has arisen to adopt effective fiscal policy mechanisms aimed at broadening the economic base and activating non-oil sectors. These mechanisms include reforming the tax system, stimulating domestic and foreign investment, supporting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), and adopting financial plans that ensure the sustainability of revenues independent of oil revenues. This research aims to analyze the most prominent fiscal policy mechanisms employed in Iraq to diversify income sources and to evaluate their effectiveness in light of current economic challenges.
First: Diversifying Economic Sectors Contributing to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)
This indicator represents the contribution of the productive, distributive, and service sectors of the economy, generated by individuals within the country and resident foreigners, to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over a specific period, usually one year. GDP measures all goods and services produced within a country during a given timeframe, encompassing all economic activities. Therefore, it serves as an indicator of the size of a nation's economy, as it measures the total output of goods and services, thus accurately and clearly reflecting the economic situation of a country.[13] In addition to encompassing the performance of all its constituent sectors, the GDP data allows for forecasting current and future trends in the country's economic development, enabling us to formulate policies for the future.[14] In Iraq, three main sectors contribute to the formation of the gross domestic product, as we mentioned previously. These sectors consist of sub-activities. The first is the productive sectors (agricultural, industrial, oil, electricity-water, and construction). The second is the distribution sectors (transport, wholesale-retail, insurance, and finance). The third is the services sector (housing, social development, and personal services). These sectors, over the course of two decades, have remained diverse in their formation of the gross domestic product. When tracing the composition of the gross domestic product of the Iraqi economy, we find that it has been characterized by structural imbalance due to the primary and main dependence on oil to finance its resources. Extractive industries have taken the lead in their contribution to the formation of the gross domestic product at the expense of the decline in the productivity of the basic economic sectors represented by agriculture, manufacturing, and other activities, which has resulted in the failure to achieve economic balance. The continued decline in the contribution of productive sectors to GDP, coupled with a clear government tendency to support commodity-based activities at the expense of service and distribution activities, has led to structural imbalances in the relative distribution of the national economy's sectors.
These imbalances constitute obstacles to progress and development, ultimately resulting in fluctuating productivity in non-oil sectors, a low contribution to GDP, and a high degree of dependence on the oil sector. The following table illustrates the contribution of the main economic sectors to GDP during the period 2004-2022.
Table (2)
The development of the contribution of local sectors to the formation of the gross domestic product (GDP) in Iraq for the period (2004-2020)
Table (2) shows the dominance of the oil sector over other productive sectors such as agriculture and industry. Its contribution in 2004 reached approximately 58%, while the agricultural sector contributed 6.9% and the industrial sector 1.8% in the same year. One reason for the low contribution of the agricultural sector (6.9%) and the industrial sector (1.8%) is that the government allowed an open-door policy for imports, which led to the influx of many cheap, high-quality foreign goods. Consequently, local products were unable to compete with these goods, resulting in a decrease in their contribution to the gross domestic product.
Furthermore, the agricultural sector is a major occupation for a large segment of Iraqi farmers and agricultural workers, providing numerous job opportunities in villages and rural areas, estimated at (30%) of the Iraqi workforce. However, the conflicts and unrest that the country witnessed after the political regime change in 2003 contributed to significant tension and instability, negatively impacting both the agricultural and industrial sectors. At that time, these sectors were in dire need of substantial investments to improve agricultural infrastructure and develop agricultural and industrial technologies and practices. This coincided with a shortage of fertilizers, pesticides, and water resources essential for agriculture, negatively affecting agricultural and industrial production. This shift led to the allocation of fewer resources to both the agricultural and industrial sectors [15].
The oil sector began to experience a gradual decline in its contribution after 2005 and continued to do so until 2010. This decline was attributed to the drop in oil prices due to the global financial crisis, from around $120 per barrel before the crisis to approximately $60 per barrel. Consequently, its contribution to GDP decreased. This was followed by the 2014 crisis and the resulting drop in international oil prices, in addition to the security instability caused by terrorist groups. The industrial sector, on the other hand, witnessed slight growth (2.3%) compared to 2004 (1.8%). This modest growth was due to government support for the industrial sector, including loans, tax reductions, and the imposition of customs tariffs on imported goods, which encouraged production. The agricultural sector, however, had a low contribution of 5.2%, compared to 6.9% in 2004. This decline was due to water scarcity, which prevented farmers from cultivating their land. Furthermore, the rising prices of fertilizers and pesticides led to a decrease in the agricultural sector's contribution to GDP. The contribution of the oil sector declined sharply in 2015, reaching 33.8%, due to a dual crisis: the drop in oil prices and the war against ISIS terrorist groups, which controlled most of the northwestern provinces. Iraq was unable to export oil through its northern ports, resulting in a decrease in crude oil exports compared to pre-war levels. The average daily oil export rate, which was approximately 3.5 million barrels, fell to below 2.5 million barrels per day. Furthermore, the decline in global oil prices led to a decrease in oil revenues compared to previous years and the higher levels achieved. The agricultural sector also declined to 3.9% in 2016. This was because terrorist groups seized all agricultural lands in the five northern provinces, including the most productive agricultural areas. They shipped one million tons of food and grain to Syria, depriving approximately 400,000 farmers of their income. They also seized agricultural equipment, used irrigation pipes to make improvised explosive devices, and cut off water supplies to farmers as punishment.[16] Consequently, its contribution to the formation of the gross domestic product decreased, not to mention the policy of dumping and opening the door to imports of agricultural products at low prices.[17] The industrial sector did not make progress, although some factories in the northern governorates closed, but its contribution remained constant throughout the period.
The agricultural sector's contribution to GDP increased to 6.2% in 2020 as a result of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the increased demand for agricultural products. The government also boosted domestic production to reduce its dependence on food imports and enhance self-sufficiency. The sharp decline in oil prices prompted the government to strengthen agriculture and improve agricultural technologies and practices, leading to increased production. Consumer consumption habits also shifted towards healthier agricultural products. It is worth noting that the decline in the oil sector's contribution was the reason for the increase in the industrial sector's contribution in Iraq during 2020.[18]، The agricultural and industrial sectors declined once again due to the dominance of the oil sector. This was a result of Iraq's increased share of production coupled with rising global prices, which made the oil sector the largest contributor to GDP. Other sectors fluctuated, experiencing both growth and decline due to a mix of positive and negative factors.
The transport and communications sector led other distribution sectors such as the trade of goods, food commodities, and daily necessities in retail and wholesale quantities, as well as the insurance, banking, and finance sectors. In 2004, the transport and communications sector contributed approximately (8.3%), while the wholesale and retail sector contributed (6.1%) and insurance (1.2%) for the same year. The transport and communications sector's leading position resulted from the expansion of commercial activity and the transport of goods, services, and imported commercial merchandise, in addition to the recovery of the tourism sector, as travel to certain countries required only a personal ID card. This increased the sector's contribution to the gross domestic product, although its contribution percentages were considered low. Furthermore, the contribution of telecommunications and internet services in providing information services, monitoring global prices, and facilitating flight booking methods also contributed to this. Maritime transport suffered from a lack of investment, both domestically and internationally, due to poor infrastructure and a shortage of transport equipment. Most land routes were damaged and destroyed as a result of bombing and sabotage operations, not to mention the vandalism, looting, and theft that affected main roads, such as the security wall and traffic signals.[19] The insurance and finance sector did not make a significant contribution to GDP despite economic liberalization with global markets, increased imports, and rising oil revenues. This was due to the lack of strategic planning for future projections and the continued focus on exporting crude oil for the resulting financial surpluses. The transport and communications sector declined by 5.8% in 2010 as a result of the global financial crisis and a decrease in domestic and international travel. The wholesale and retail trade sector recorded slight growth of 7.7%, driven by increased domestic consumption, higher demand for imported goods, and a growing population that reached approximately 33 million, compared to around 28 million in 2004. The contribution of the insurance and banking sectors remained unchanged, even considering government support and the number of licenses granted for establishing private banks to serve various sectors. In 2016, the transport and communications sector's contribution rose to 11.5%, and the wholesale and retail trade sector's contribution increased to 9.4%, while the insurance and banking sectors did not register significant growth. (1.7%), after which the contribution rate witnessed a slight decrease to reach (10.4%) in the year (2020). This is attributed to the impact on the transport and communications sector and the greater decrease in air and domestic travel, as many flights were canceled at the tourist and commercial (carrying goods and merchandise) level, which negatively affected airlines, causing them to incur significant financial losses, and public transport services were halted and replaced by personal means of transport.[20] The contribution then fluctuated, reaching 10.4% in 2020. It subsequently declined to 10% in 2021. This decrease in the sector's performance is attributed to reduced efficiency, with funds and resources being directed primarily towards operational expenses (salaries and wages), as well as increased spending on healthcare, including the purchase of medical equipment and treatments for those infected with the virus. Furthermore, investment spending and support projects were suspended until further notice.
The social development and real estate services sector had high contribution rates, reaching 15.6% in 2004 and rising to 27.5% in 2015. However, due to the repercussions of the health crisis, the high number of COVID-19 infections, and the lack of control over its spread or the availability of a vaccine, the government had no option but to provide service expenditures. These expenditures contributed approximately 33% to the GDP in 2020.
It is clear from the above that the Iraqi economy has suffered from significant distortions in its development and the achievements of these sectors. This is a result of their declining contribution to the GDP, particularly in the goods sector. This necessitates the adoption of reform policies. These policies should not be limited to enacting legislation but should embrace a clear philosophy for these reforms and implement a set of programs that represent the legislative and institutional frameworks, as well as infrastructure reform. The goal is to create an investment-friendly environment and prioritize private sector development.
Second: Developing the Agricultural Sector
Many economists have discussed the importance of the agricultural sector's role in economic development and have contributed to this topic through studies and research. They have highlighted the role of agricultural production resources in generating income that contributes to the general budget, and its responsibility for providing food for the population, in addition to its industrial and commercial importance. Therefore, the issue of developing and improving the agricultural sector in Iraq should be given special attention. This is facilitated by Iraq's vast agricultural lands and sufficient water resources, which are necessary to bring about a qualitative leap in the development of the agricultural sector, leading to increased agricultural production and, consequently, economic diversification.[21]
Therefore, the government can take successful practical measures to activate the role of the agricultural sector in the structure of the Iraqi economy, particularly in economic diversification. This can be achieved through a set of measures, including:
Third: Developing the Industrial Sector
The manufacturing sector contributes between 60% and 66% of the world's merchandise exports in the modern economy. This is a fundamental fact that rentier economies cannot ignore; they have no option but to diversify. When the export basket of rentier states consists solely of oil, expanding the commodity production base, particularly in export-oriented manufacturing, becomes a crucial prerequisite for economic development and, consequently, economic diversification. The industrial sector is unique in its ability to achieve production diversification through its numerous stages of production processes, which contribute to the production of diverse goods that enhance export capacity. Furthermore, it facilitates structural and technological transformation and the expansion of manufacturing .[29] The manufacturing sector is capable of generating employment opportunities and subsequently increasing them through its sequential processes until the manufacturing stage is complete. Afterward, expansion and the generation of new jobs shift to the tertiary sector. Generally, industrial development programs implemented in oil-producing countries have aimed to achieve overarching goals, including economic diversification, reducing dependence on oil revenues, providing employment opportunities for the workforce, developing and utilizing local resources, and promoting import-substitution industries [31].
The industrial sector also plays a significant role in driving economic development in developed countries and some transitional countries. This sector is a crucial source of funding for development and the growth of other economic sectors, second only to the oil sector. Manufacturing processes produce new goods from raw materials, diversifying production and increasing the volume of manufactured goods in non-extractive exports. This, in turn, contributes to diversifying income sources and thus increases its contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP). Therefore, this sector is considered a vital tool for diversification .[32]
The National Development Plan has set a vision for the industrial sector, embodied in an Iraqi industry that effectively contributes to diversifying the local economy within a competitive environment and global partnerships. This vision includes several key objectives, most notably increasing the industrial sector's contribution to the gross domestic product and encouraging the private sector to play its role in this vital area.[33]
It is worth noting that production diversification reduces the risk of economic vulnerability created by dependence on a single export commodity. A diversified export base leads to greater stability in revenues and, consequently, economic development. On the import side, diversification creates a commercial sector capable of meeting domestic needs under normal circumstances and during crises such as political disputes.[34]
Developing productive capacities through diversification requires economic policies that secure financial resources and invest in establishing industries that capitalize on the advantages of abundant natural resources. These industries include downstream industries based on the same exported materials, particularly petrochemicals and oil refining, in addition to other industries.[35] To achieve industrial diversification in the country's economy, a set of measures is required:
Fourth: Expanding the Productivity Base of Small and Medium Enterprises
Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are among the most important pillars of the development process in the country and a key entry point for economic diversification, as they provide real job opportunities for unemployed youth and thus contribute to reducing unemployment. Furthermore, these enterprises serve as the cornerstone of the private sector's operations and its participation in economic activity.[38] In addition, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) contribute to urban and spatial development and occupy an important position in the industrial sector in particular and the country's economic structure in general due to the locational flexibility resulting from their small size, and their ability to spread in small urban centers and rural areas.[39]
According to statistics from the Central Statistical Organization, Iraq has approximately 198 medium-sized industrial establishments across the country, employing 253 workers, with a total industrial production value of around 18,985 million dinars .As for small industrial establishments, their number reached approximately 25,747, employing around 7,965 workers, and the value of industrial production reached approximately 208,689 million dinars.[40] Expanding the base of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can contribute to spreading a culture of self-employment and productivity among young people, provide income-generating job opportunities for new entrants to the labor market, absorb thousands of unemployed individuals, and integrate youth economically, socially, and politically. The importance of this developmental requirement stems from the fact that SMEs are the dominant business model in Iraq, absorbing a large portion of the private sector workforce and contributing significantly to non-oil GDP. Therefore, strengthening and supporting these enterprises and creating a suitable environment for their operation paves the way for activating the role of the local private sector in the Iraqi economy. This reduces the national economy's exposure to the outside world, thereby expanding and diversifying its production base to facilitate economic reforms in line with and keeping pace with new developments in the global landscape. Among the means and methods that support the operation of these enterprises are the following:
Building institutional capacity for SME development by enhancing their competitiveness through grant matching programs to improve productivity, import substitution, and export promotion, and working to improve their access to financing for the transfer of modern technology and expertise.
Fifth: Developing the Tourism Sector
When discussing tourism as a sustainable economic resource in a country like Iraq, one cannot ignore its diverse tourism potential, encompassing religious, natural, and archaeological aspects. Despite these rich resources, the challenges Iraq has faced over the past decades have negatively impacted these assets, leading to a decline in their role as an effective economic driver.
For tourism to regain its prominence and become an economic pillar parallel to oil, the country's primary traditional resource, significant efforts in rehabilitation and strategic planning are required to revitalize the tourism sector. In this context, a number of proposals can be put forward to stimulate tourism in Iraq, including improving infrastructure, developing services, and effectively promoting tourist sites both domestically and internationally[41].
. A comprehensive range of efficient public services and facilities is required, including airports, seaports, communication services, banks, modern transportation networks, and recreational facilities, to ensure a complete visitor experience.
Recommendations:
[1] S. Khalil, Monetary and Financial Theories and Policies, 1st ed. Kuwait: Kazma Publishing House, 1982, p. 693.
[2] A. H. Abdul, “Analysis of the Impact of Fiscal Policy Instruments on Economic Growth in the Iraqi Economy 2004–2023,” Al-Ghari Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 695, 2024.
[3] A. Q. M. A. Atiya and R. M. A. Muqallad, Macroeconomic Theory. Alexandria, Egypt: Dar Al-Maarifa Al-Jamiya, 2005, p. 317.
[4] Y. R. Younis and B. S. Karim, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth in Iraq, Master’s thesis, College of Administration and Economics, Salahaddin University, Erbil, Iraq, 2010, p. 592.
[5] L. A. Karim and G. S. Baheeth, “Measuring and Analyzing the Impact of Political Indicators on Gross Domestic Product in Iraq for the Period 2004–2020,” Journal of Wasit University for Administrative and Economic Sciences, vol. 50, no. 16, 2024.
[6] A. H. Hassan and H. J. Hassan, “The Impact of Public Revenues on the Economic Growth Rate in Iraq for the Period 2004–2020,” Journal of the College of Administration and Economics for Economic, Administrative and Financial Studies, University of Babylon, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 81, 2024.
[7] K. H. Hamza, M. A. Ali, and S. R. Hussein, “Fiscal Policy and Its Role in Preparing for Economic Diversification in Iraq,” Journal of Administration and Economics, Al-Mustansiriya University, vol. 50, no. 147, pp. 1–22, Mar. 2025.
[8] I. A. L. Muhammad, Oil Revenues, Budget Surplus, and Deficit in Iraq (2004–2020), Iraqi Parliament, Research Department, Baghdad, Iraq, Rep., Feb. 2022.
[9] A. H. A. Al-Shafi’i and S. A. I. Ahmed, “The Reality of the Tax System in Iraq and the Possibility of Development,” Journal of Administration and Economics, Al-Mustansiriya University, no. 127, pp. 45–63, Mar. 2021.
[10] F. A. Al-Shahrani, “Causes, Effects, and Ways to Reform Administrative Corruption,” Academic Journal of Research and Scientific Publishing, no. 21, p. 268, 2021.
[11] Y. K. Barakat, “Administrative Corruption: Concept, Manifestations, and Causes with Reference to Iraq,” Nabaa Magazine, no. 80, pp. 12–28, Jan. 2006.
[12] T. A. Jassim, Government Spending Paths and Program Budgeting in Iraq (2006–2019), Master’s thesis, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq, 2021, p. 105.
[13] F. M. Samundengu, Trade Openness and Economic Growth in Namibia, Master’s thesis, Dept. of Economics, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia, 2016, p. 3.
[14] Y. S. Nayef, A. H. Salman, and M. A. Khalaf, “Measuring the Impact of Economic Fluctuations on GDP in Iraq (2010–2020),” Tikrit Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences, vol. 3, no. 19, p. 394, 2023.
[15] A. J. Abdel-Hussein, M. J. Abd, and W. R. Rahi, “Global Sectoral Changes and Gross Domestic Growth in Iraq (1990–2020),” Warith Scientific Journal, vol. 5, p. 160, 2023.
[16] A. Mirza, “Economic Issues in Iraq 2003–2020: Production Structure, Policy, and Crises,” Iraqi Economists Network, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://iraqieconomists.net/ar/
. [Accessed: Jan. 9, 2026].
[17] A. J. K. Bakheet, S. Ahmed, and M. M. Ali, “The Importance of the Agricultural Sector for Achieving Food Security in Iraq,” Journal of Administration and Economics, University of Karbala, Special Issue, p. 11, 2023.
[18] A. J. Hammadi and R. H. Ali, “Date Palm Cultivation and Its Contribution to GDP in Iraq (2005–2020),” Al-Kut Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, vol. 14, no. 44, p. 378, 2022.
[19] M. N. Mohammed and A. A. Yousef, “Economic Indicators of the Iraqi Civil Aviation Sector (2014–2018),” Iraqi Journal of Administrative Sciences, vol. 16, no. 56, p. 150, 2020.
[20] S. H. Hassan, “Economic Development Efforts and Structural Imbalances in Iraq (2007–2018),” Journal of Accounting and Financial Studies, vol. 16, no. 55, p. 172, 2021.
[21] A. O. Al-Rawi, “The Future of the Iraqi Agricultural Sector in Light of New Variables,” Iraqi Journal of Economic Sciences, no. 13, p. 56, 2007.
[22] I. H. Ibrahim, “Agricultural Policy and Sectoral Problems in Iraq (1990–2008),” Baghdad College of Economic Sciences University Journal, no. 41, pp. 426–432, 2014.
[23] M. S. H. Ali, “The Role of the State in Overcoming Obstacles to Agricultural Development in Iraq After 2003,” Journal of Accounting and Financial Studies, vol. 6, no. 14, p. 16, 2011.
[24] World Bank Group, Rising from a Fragile State: An Economic Note on Diversification and Growth in Iraq, Washington, DC, USA, Rep., 2020, p. 11.
[25] Arab Organization for Agricultural Development, The Repercussions of Rising Global Food Prices on Living Standards, Khartoum, Sudan, Jan. 2009, p. 24.
[26] S. M. Attallah and A. A. Abdullah, “The Role of the Agricultural Sector in Achieving Economic Growth in Iraq (1996–2016),” Journal of Business Economics, no. 2, p. 276, 2021.
[27] A. B. Al-Ali, Diversification in Oil Export-Dependent Economies, Baghdad, Iraq, 2018, p. 4.
[28] A. O. Al-Rawi, “The Future of the Iraqi Agricultural Sector in Light of New Variables,” Iraqi Journal of Economic Sciences, no. 13, p. 34, 2007.
[29] S. M. Attallah and A. A. Abdullah, “The Role of the Agricultural Sector in Achieving Economic Growth in Iraq (1996–2016),” Journal of Business Economics, no. 2, p. 276, 2021.
[30] N. D. Assaf and K. R. Awad, “Requirements for Economic Diversification in Iraq under a Free Market Economy,” University of Anbar Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Special Issue, pp. 482–483, 2015.
[31] T. Al-Khudayri, “Iraq’s Manufacturing Industry: Status and Prospects,” in Iraq’s Economic Predicament, M. Mahdi, Ed. Baghdad, Iraq, 2006, p. 31.
[32] H. N. Bakheet and A. F. Atiwi, “Justifications for Economic Diversification in Iraq (1980–2014),” Al-Ghari Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, no. 3, p. 853, 2017.
[33] Republic of Iraq, Ministry of Planning, National Development Plan 2018–2022, Baghdad, Iraq, Rep., p. 32.
[34] H. L. Kadhim and S. F. Al-Talqani, “Economic Transformation in Iraq: Problems and Alternatives,” Al-Ghari Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 44, 2017.
[35] A. B. Ali, Diversification in Oil Export-Dependent Economies, Baghdad, Iraq, 2018, p. 7.
[36] J. E. Sanford, Iraq’s Economy: Past, Present, and Future, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, USA, Rep. RL31944, Jun. 2003, p. 31.
[37] Republic of Iraq, Council of Ministers, Private Sector Development Strategy 2014–2030, Baghdad, Iraq, Rep., 2014, p. 17.
[38] M. B. Saha, Non-Oil Exports and Economic Growth in Algeria, Master’s thesis, University Center of Ghardaia, Algeria, 2011, p. 157.
[39] H. L. Al-Zubaidi, A. H. Ali, and M. S. Karim, Rapid Labor Market Assessment in Southern Iraq, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, Rep., 2020, p. 14.
[40] Ministry of Planning, Statistics on Medium Industrial Establishments, Central Statistical Organization, Baghdad, Iraq, Rep., 2020, pp. 27–29.
[41] S. S. Dali, “Tourism Development Components and Economic Diversification in Iraq,” Iraqi Journal of Economic Sciences, no. 62, p. 70, 2019.