Qurnia Rahmawati (1), Ahmad Nailul (2)
General Background: Employment relationships in Indonesian labor law are determined by cumulative elements of work, wages, and orders as the basis for legal protection. Specific Background: Supreme Court Decision Number 656 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2024 raises debate on the interpretation of these elements in the context of informal workers with flexible work patterns. Knowledge Gap: There is tension between a formalistic normative approach and the need for substantive legal protection for informal workers in modern labor dynamics. Aims: This study aims to analyze how the Supreme Court interprets the elements of work, wages, and orders and to examine its implications for labor law protection. Results: The Court interprets the elements strictly based on statutory provisions, concluding that wages are not fixed due to a ritase system, the element of orders is absent due to lack of subordination and work regulation, and work is not continuous or structurally integrated, leading to the classification of the relationship as a partnership rather than an employment relationship. Novelty: The study highlights a recent judicial decision within the evolving context of flexible work arrangements and informal labor classification. Implications: Although normatively consistent with labor regulations, the interpretation reflects a formalistic approach that potentially limits substantive legal protection for informal workers, indicating the need for more progressive legal interpretation oriented toward worker protection principles.
Highlights• Strict cumulative interpretation determines legal classification as partnership• Flexible work patterns exclude recognition of normative wage structure• Formal legal reasoning constrains protection scope for non-formal labor
KeywordsEmployment Relationship; Informal Workers; Legal Protection; Supreme Court Decision; Labour Law
[1] A. M. Setiawan dan N. Suryawati, “Penyimpangan kesepakatan dalam perjanjian kerja antara pemberi kerja dan pekerja,” Reformasi Hukum, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 214–225, 2023, doi: 10.46257/jrh.v27i3.740.
[2] A. Maulana, “Penyelundupan hukum dengan menggunakan hubungan kemitraan pada status yang seharusnya hubungan kerja yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan dengan pekerjanya,” Jurnal Suara Keadilan, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2020, doi: 10.24176/sk.v21i1.5676.
[3] O. F. Alpalah, T. Marlina, dan G. Y. Andri, “Implementation of employment agreements for health workers in private hospitals,” Hukum Responsif, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 343–358, 2024, doi: 10.33603/responsif.v15i2.9536.
[4] N. Illahi, K. M. Silviani, Z. Maulidiana, dan L. Famulia, “Exploring labor union rights and protection: An analysis of Indonesian employment law,” Barelang Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 130–150, 2023.
[5] H. P. Rejeki, T. T. Suriaatmaja, dan O. Yanto, “Legal protection for workers with fixed-term employment agreements (PKWT) based on a review of the Job Creation regulation,” Sinergi International Journal of Law, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 142–151, 2025, doi: 10.61194/law.v3i3.793.
[6] M. Manurung et al., “Pengaturan hukum hubungan kerja antara pengusaha dan pekerja dalam kaitannya dengan perjanjian kerja bersama (PKB),” Jurnal Pionir LPPM Universitas Asahan, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 252–261, 2022.
[7] BPHN Puslitbang, Laporan Pengkajian Hukum, Jakarta, 2010.
[8] H. Edi dan S. Kumar, “Legal protection of workers’ rights by the Job Creation Law,” International Journal of Law Review and State Administration, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2024, doi: 10.58818/ijlrsa.v2i1.107.
[9] K. R. A. Santoso, Sobirin, dan N. E. Agustina, “Perlindungan hukum ketenagakerjaan: Upaya meningkatkan kesejahteraan pekerja,” Ikamakum, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 124, 2023.
[10] S. R. Arbi dan I. F. Susilowati, “Penegakan hukum ketenagakerjaan terhadap pembayaran upah di bawah upah minimum kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Jawa Timur,” Novum Jurnal Hukum, pp. 74–83, 2023.
[11] M. Kamal, “Workers protection with a fixed-term employment contract system based on employment statutory regulations,” Substantive Justice: International Journal of Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 180–195, 2020, doi: 10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.89.
[12] Y. Y. W., S. -, dan D. A. Ramadhani, “Implementasi Undang-Undang ketenagakerjaan dalam perjanjian kerja antara perusahaan dan tenaga kerja di perseroan terbatas,” Jurnal Yuridis, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 186, 2019, doi: 10.35586/.v5i2.767.
[13] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, serta Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja, Jakarta, 2021.
[14] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan, Jakarta, 2003.
[15] M. R. F. Romadhoni, Y. P. Wardoyo, dan R. K. Nuryasinta, “Implementation of compensation for workers ending contract early: Labor law perspectives,” Indonesian Law Reform Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 229–242, 2024, doi: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i3.36139.
[16] N. Dalimunthe et al., “Penerapan perjanjian kerja dalam perusahaan terhadap hak ketenagakerjaan,” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 83–106, 2023, doi: 10.54066/jura-itb.v1i3.397.