Jhon Elvis Situmeang (1), Rizki Jutarido Zahri (2), Arfiansyah Arfiansyah (3)
General Background: The General Principles of Good Governance constitute fundamental norms in state administrative law that guide the legality of governmental actions. Specific Background: In Indonesia’s licensing administration, these principles are formally regulated to ensure legal certainty, transparency, accountability, and public interest, yet licensing practices frequently deviate through abuse of authority and corruption cases. Knowledge Gap: Existing enforcement mechanisms tend to prioritize criminal prosecution without first addressing administrative violations, resulting in weak integration between administrative law and criminal law. Aims: This study aims to analyze juridically the enforcement of Good Governance Principles in licensing corruption cases and to clarify the proper qualification of such violations within the administrative law framework. Results: The findings demonstrate that violations of Good Governance Principles in licensing constitute abuse of authority that should be initially addressed as administrative violations before criminal proceedings, in order to ensure legal coherence. Novelty: This study emphasizes the juridical positioning of administrative sanctions as a preliminary mechanism prior to criminal liability in licensing corruption cases. Implications: Strengthening regulations, internal supervision by governmental auditors, the role of the Ombudsman, and licensing digitalization is essential to support transparent, accountable, and clean governance based on administrative law principles.
• Licensing corruption reflects systemic violations of good governance principles through abuse of administrative authority• Administrative accountability remains weak due to limited integration between administrative and criminal legal frameworks• Strengthening supervisory institutions and digital licensing systems is central to clean and accountable governance
General Principles Of Good Governance; Abuse Of Authority; Licensing Corruption; State Administrative Law; Administrative Enforcement
[1] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (BAPPENAS RI), Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Jakarta, 1945.
[2] Administrasi Publik, “Pengertian Detournement de Pouvoir dalam Kaitannya dengan Freies Ermessen,” 2019.
[3] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 292, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5601.
[4] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
[5] Indroharto, Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 2003.
[6] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), “Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik,” Statistika Perbankan Syariah, 2023.
[7] T. S. Djatmiati, “Prinsip iktikad baik dalam keputusan administrasi negara,” Jurnal Yuridika, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 275–290, 2012.
[8] M. Azhar, “Relevansi asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik dalam sistem penyelenggaraan administrasi negara,” Notarius, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 274–287, 2015.
[9] H. D. Sari, Asas dan Fungsi Pemerintahan: Implementasi AAUPB dalam Pelayanan Publik, Sidenreng Rappang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang, 2022.
[10] D. Haryati, T. Suharsono, dan M. E. Yuniza, “Penerapan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik dalam sistem pelayanan perizinan satu pintu,” Mimbar Hukum, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 289, 2012.
[11] E. Kusdarini, “Asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik pada produk hukum perizinan investasi pemerintah daerah,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 663–688, 2017.
[12] Z. Mandasari, “AAUPB dan dinamika pelayanan perizinan persetujuan bangunan gedung,” Japhtn-Han, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 81–108, 2023.
[13] Yuliandri, Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan yang Baik, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.
[14] P. M. Hadjon et al., Hukum Administrasi dan Good Governance, Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 2010.
[15] A. Rahim, N. U. Safitri, N. Nurjanah, S. Anabah, dan W. Nurhikmah, “Implementasi hukum administrasi negara dalam mencegah praktik korupsi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan (JIIP), vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 5790–5794, 2023.
[16] K. Prawiranegara, “Implementasi asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik pada pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu,” Jurnal Lex Renaissance, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 591–604, 2021.
[17] F. Hilal, R. A. I. Irawan, Irmawati, “Peran audit internal (APIP) dalam meningkatkan efektivitas pengawasan dan pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli, vol. 7, no. 2, 2024.
[18] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
[19] Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2018.