Ananda Surya Dharma (1), Mella Ismelina Farma Rahayu (2)
Background General: Asset disclosure through the LHKPN system serves as a transparency mechanism to prevent corruption among state officials. Background Specific: In practice, several officials report granted assets without authentic deeds, even though Indonesian civil law requires notarial or PPAT deeds for the legal validity of grants. Knowledge Gap: No comprehensive study has specifically examined the legal certainty of reporting grants without authentic deeds in the LHKPN system or its interaction with civil law and anti-corruption regulations. Aims: This study analyzes the legal status of grants made without authentic deeds under Indonesian law and evaluates the legal certainty of their reporting within the LHKPN. Results: Findings indicate that grants lacking authentic deeds do not fulfill the formal requirements of Articles 1666, 1682, and 1868 of the Civil Code, rendering them invalid and lacking evidentiary strength. Their inclusion in the LHKPN creates legal uncertainty regarding ownership legitimacy and the accuracy of verification by the Corruption Eradication Commission. Novelty: The study provides an integrated analysis connecting civil law, administrative anti-corruption mechanisms, and legal certainty theory to the issue of non-authentic grant reporting. Implications: Normative clarification and regulatory harmonization are required to ensure that grants reported in the LHKPN possess lawful foundations, strengthening transparency, accountability, and the integrity of state officials.
Highlights:
Highlights the legal invalidity of grants without authentic deeds.
Emphasizes the resulting uncertainty in LHKPN asset verification.
Calls for regulatory harmonization to ensure accountable reporting.
Keywords: Grant, Authentic Deed, Legal Certainty, LHKPN , Asset Reporting
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 2019.
Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijke Wetboek), 1847.
R. L. S. Yuhelson and B. Utoyo, “Existence of Agreement in Foreign Language in the Process of Verification in the Court,” Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 357–364, 2020, doi: 10.37905/aksara.6.3.357-364.2020.
M. Djafar, “Kekuatan Hukum Akta di Bawah Tangan dalam Praktek di Pengadilan,” Lex Privatum, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 103–107, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/issue/view/1183
M. Y. Juliansyah and M. Ismelina, “The Role of Notaries and PPAT in the Implementation of Anti-Money Laundering Programs Based on the Precautionary Principle,” Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 610, 2024, doi: 10.63922/ajmesc.v4i01.644.
Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2015 Tentang Pihak Pelapor dalam Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, 2015.
A. Suherman, “Esensi Asas Legalitas dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan,” Jurnal Bina Hukum Lingkungan, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 136, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://bhl-jurnal.or.id/index.php/bhl/article/view/129
A. Muliawati, “LHKPN Rafael Alun Rp 56 M tapi Aset yang Disita KPK Sampai Rp 150 M,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6787491/lhkpn-rafael-alun-rp-56-m-tapi-aset-yang-disita-kpk-sampai-rp-150-m
Anni, “Modus Pencucian Uang Rafael Alun: Pakai Nama Ibu, Lalu Dihibahkan,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/modus-pencucian-uang-rafael-alun-pakai-nama-ibu-lalu-dihibahkan-215jSDgH6Uu/3
D. Harmono et al., “Kewajiban Pelaporan Harta Kekayaan bagi Penyelenggara Negara,” USM Law Review, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 296–306, 2020, doi: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2074.
Y. V. Ingnuan and M. Lutfi, “Pelaksanaan Peningkatan Kepatuhan Pelaporan LHKPN,” Jurnal Ekobis, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 134, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.stiemj.ac.id/index.php/ekobis
A. Wibisono, “Determinan Intensi Pelaporan Pelanggaran: Studi Empiris pada Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara,” Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 204, 2018, doi: 10.24914/jeb.v21i2.1985.
A. F. Kahar, “Pengampunan Pajak dan Harta Hasil Tindak Pidana,” Journal of Education and Development, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 185, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/1678/825
W. G. Salim, “Kepastian Hukum terhadap Tidak Dilaporkan Harta Kekayaan Penyelenggara Negara dalam Penyeleksian Calon Pimpinan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi,” Journal of Corruption Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2020, doi: 10.25041/corruptio.v1i1.2074.
Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme, 1999.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Peraturan KPK Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Peraturan KPK Nomor 7 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran, Pengumuman, dan Pemeriksaan LHKPN, 2020.
Kementerian Dalam Negeri, Surat Edaran Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 700/6597/SJ Tahun 2014 Tentang Kewajiban Penyampaian LHKPN di Lingkungan Kementerian Dalam Negeri dan Pemerintah Daerah, 2014.
Indonesia, Instruksi Presiden Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 Tentang Percepatan Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2004.
H. Adji, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik, 2nd ed. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
S. Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
P. M. Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.
Y. J. Utama, Membangun Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yang Berwibawa. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.
P. M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
R. HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Revised ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.