Login
Section Engineering

Six Main Priorities for Better Driving License Services

Enam Prioritas Utama untuk Peningkatan Layanan Surat Izin Mengemudi
Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): December:

Husniyyah Husniyyah (1), Sumiati Sumiati (2)

(1) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
(2) Program Studi Teknik Industri, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

(General Background) Public service quality is a fundamental aspect of building public trust in government institutions, particularly in administrative services such as the issuance of driving licenses (SIM) managed by SATPAS. (Specific Background) However, despite the government’s efforts, the public often perceives the service as inefficient, with long queues, inconsistent procedures, and unprofessional staff attitudes. (Knowledge Gap) Previous studies have not specifically identified which service attributes most influence customer satisfaction and how these can be systematically improved. (Aims) This study aims to evaluate the quality of SATPAS services using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) method and to formulate improvement strategies through the 5W+1H approach. (Results) The findings show an average satisfaction score of 3.29 and a conformity level of 83%, indicating a service quality gap. Six attributes were identified as main improvement priorities: service punctuality, speed, staff readiness, information clarity, cost transparency, and staff politeness. (Novelty) The integration of IPA and 5W+1H provides a structured and practical framework for prioritizing and implementing service improvements. (Implications) The proposed model can be applied in other public institutions to enhance accountability, efficiency, and citizen satisfaction in public service delivery.


Highlights:




  • Identifies six key priorities for improving SATPAS service quality.




  • Combines IPA and 5W+1H methods for targeted service enhancement.




  • Provides a practical framework to boost efficiency and public trust.




Keywords: Service Quality, Importance Performance Analysis, 5W+1H, Public Service, Customer Satisfaction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. R. Budiarto and B. Santoso, “Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Konsumen Menggunakan Metode Service Performance, Lean Service, Dan Importance Performance Analysis,” Juminten, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 33–44, 2020, doi: 10.33005/juminten.v1i2.93.

B. Giovanno Pratama and B. Rahardjo, “Analisis dan Usulan Perbaikan untuk Defect Pemasangan Lift,” Jurnal Titra, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2020.

Hanifah, F. S. Lubis, Harpito, M. Hartati, and Nofirza, “Usulan Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Pasien Menggunakan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Potential Gain in Customer Value (PGCV) di Puskesmas XYZ,” Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1009–1019, 2025, doi: 10.33087/jiubj.v25i1.5722.

A. P. Irnanda, R. Anindya, N. Afifah, and S. S. Yuniar, “Penerapan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) dengan Menggunakan Analisis 5W+1H di PT. DIM,” Reka Karya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229–242, 2023, doi: 10.26760/rekakarya.v2i2.229-242.

N. F. Amin, S. Garancang, and K. Abunawas, “Konsep Umum Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian,” Buku Ajar Statistik Dasar, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–31, 2023, doi: 10.21070/2017/978-979-3401-73-7.

T. Tugiman, H. Herman, and A. Yudhana, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner Model UTAUT untuk Evaluasi Sistem Pendaftaran Online Rumah Sakit,” JATISI (Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi), vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1621–1630, 2022, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v9i2.2227.

Asrulla, Risnita, M. S. Jailani, and F. Jeka, “Populasi dan Sampling (Kuantitatif), serta Pemilihan Informan Kunci (Kualitatif) dalam Pendekatan Praktis,” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 26320–26332, 2023.

S. Romdono, S. S. Junista, and A. Gunawan, “Teknik Pengumpulan Data: Observasi, Wawancara, dan Kuesioner,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Politik, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–47, 2025.

E. Rosita, W. Hidayat, and W. Yuliani, “Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuesioner,” Fokus: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.qmc.binus.ac.id/2014/11/01/

M. K. Silviana and S. D. Gede, “Faktor-Faktor Terpenting yang Mempengaruhi Kepuasan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan Pengguna Jaringan 4G di Denpasar,” Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 57–74, 2020.

G. Wonga and A. A. Utami, “Customer Satisfaction Index Pengguna Bus Trans Jakarta,” Jurnal Applied Business and Economics (JABE), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 312–329, 2020.

D. Susanti and Suhendri, “Visualisasi Proses Pembuatan Surat Izin Mengemudi (SIM) Menggunakan Macromedia Flash di Satpas Polres Majalengka,” Journal of Information System and Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2022, doi: 10.56916/jistec.v1i1.82.

S. Rismen, L. Lovia, and R. Ramadoni, “Pelatihan Pengolahan Data Menggunakan Software SPSS,” ADMA: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 357–364, 2023, doi: 10.30812/adma.v3i2.2259.

D. Maulana and L. Sulistyawati, “Analisa Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Potential Gain in Customer Value (PGCV) (Studi pada Burger Garage Pandaan),” Jurnal Disrupsi Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 511–520, 2021, doi: 10.32493/drb.v4i6.14527.

R. Anastasya and F. P. Gurning, “Analisis Mutu Pelayanan Kesehatan Menggunakan Metode Servperf dan IPA pada Pasien Rawat Jalan di Rumah Sakit Islam Malahayati Medan,” Tropical Public Health Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–111, 2023, doi: 10.32734/trophico.v3i2.13234.

S. Ramadhani and Nurhayati, “Analisis Kinerja Pelayanan Publik di Instansi Pemerintah Daerah,” Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1007–1028, 2021.