Login
Section Education

The Effect of Using Grammarly Apps on High School Students in Writing Recount Text Achievement


Pengaruh Penggunaan Aplikasi Grammarly terhadap Prestasi Menulis Teks Narasi Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): June:

Masyitah Nurilla Mahdi (1), Wahyu Taufiq (2)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo, Indonesia

Abstract:

General Background The integration of digital and artificial intelligence technologies has become increasingly prominent in English language education, particularly to support writing development among learners of English as a Foreign Language. Specific Background Writing recount texts requires accurate grammar control, especially the simple past tense, which remains a persistent difficulty for vocational high school students. Knowledge Gap While previous studies on Grammarly mainly focus on senior high schools and universities, evidence from vocational school contexts is still limited. Aims This study aimed to examine whether the use of the Grammarly application contributes to students’ achievement in writing recount texts. Results Using a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test control group design with 28 students in each group, the experimental class obtained a higher post-test mean score (87.86) than the control class (80.54), with a statistically significant difference (t = 3.337, p = 0.002), alongside a positive gain score and reduced score dispersion. Novelty The study provides empirical data from an underrepresented vocational education setting and demonstrates structured integration of automated feedback with guided revision practices. Implications The findings indicate that AI-based proofreading tools can be systematically incorporated into EFL writing instruction to support grammatical accuracy and more consistent learner performance


212506,+newartikel+ilmiah+masyi…


.


Keywords : Grammarly, Recount Text Writing, Vocational EFL Students, Grammar Accuracy, Quasi Experimental Design


Key Findings Highlights:




  1. Experimental group obtained higher mean outcomes than the conventional class




  2. Score variation decreased indicating more uniform learner progress




  3. Automated feedback combined with revision practice supported error correction



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] R. Tandon, “Education 4.0: A New Paradigm in Transforming the Future of Education in India,” International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 32–54, 2020.

[2] W. Taufiq and F. Megawati, Technology for English Language Learners. Sidoarjo, Indonesia: UMSIDA Press, 2023, doi: 10.21070/2023/978-623-464-072-4.

[3] A. A. Herawati, S. Yusuf, I. Ilfiandra, A. Taufik, and A. S. Ya Habibi, “Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Students’ Preferences and Perceptions,” Al-Ishlah: Journal of Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1029–1040, 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i2.4784.

[4] Y. D. Pratama, “The Investigation of Using Grammarly as an Online Grammar Checker in Writing,” Journal of English Language Teaching Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2020.

[5] D. Agustini, Y. Hendrety, and F. Sari, “The Correlation Between Past Tense Mastery and Writing Skill in Personal Recount Text,” Didascein: Journal of English Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 89–98, 2021, doi: 10.52333/d.v2i2.829.

[6] Kambali, “Emotional and Intellectual Growth During the Prenatal Period,” Risalah: Journal of Education and Islamic Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 129–148, 2018, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3555419.

[7] W. Taufiq and M. F. Fachrizzal, “The Connection Between Students’ Grammar Mastery of Simple Past Tense and Their Speaking Ability in Recount Text,” UMSIDA Preprint Service, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.21070/ups.1934.

[8] N. Setiani and G. Saragih, “The Use of Simple Past Tense and Conjunctions in Indonesian High-School Students’ Writing,” Inference: Journal of English Language Teaching, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 105–114, 2020.

[9] M. A. Ghufron and F. Rosyida, “The Role of Grammarly in Assessing English as a Foreign Language Writing,” Lingua Cultura, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 395–403, 2018, doi: 10.21512/lc.v12i4.4582.

[10] L. K. Ummah and M. Bisriyah, “EFL Students’ Perceptions of Grammarly Premium Feedback and Dealing with Inaccuracies,” Journal of English Educators Society, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2022, doi: 10.21070/jees.v7i2.

[11] A. Dale, J. Wathan, and V. Higgins, “Secondary Analysis of Quantitative Data Sources,” in Researching Society and Culture, London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2012, doi: 10.4135/9781446212165.n31.

[12] I. Nofrika, “EFL Students’ Voices: The Role of YouTube in Developing English Competences,” Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.18196/ftl.4138.

[13] L. Karyuatry, “Grammarly as a Tool to Improve Students’ Writing Quality: Free Online Proofreader Across the Boundaries,” Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 83–90, 2018, doi: 10.30595/jssh.v2i1.2297.

[14] C. K. Galingging, K. T. Sipayung, H. Silitonga, and S. Pardede, “The Effectiveness of Grammarly Application on Writing Descriptive Text of Tenth Grade Students at SMA Negeri 1 Lau Baleng,” Journal of Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2891–2904, 2023.

[15] S. D. Wijayanti, “Teachers’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Using Grammarly as a Tool for Writing Assessment,” Linguistik: Journal of Language Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: 10.31604/linguistik.v6i2.342-355.

[16] P. Maulidina and H. Wibowo, “The Use of Grammarly Tools to Enrich Students’ Writing Ability,” Lingua: Journal of Language and Education, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 179–189, 2022, doi: 10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246.

[17] E. W. Dewi, J. Nurkamto, and N. A. Drajati, “Exploring Peer-Assessment Practice in Graduate Students’ Academic Writing,” LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 58–65, 2019, doi: 10.24071/llt.v22i1.1776.

[18] D. Ary and L. C. Jacobs, Introduction to Research in Education, 10th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Cengage Learning, 2021.

[19] A. Tambunan, “Investigating EFL Students’ Linguistic Problems Using Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback,” Psychological Research on Urban Society, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2019.

[20] J. Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching, 4th ed. London, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2007.

[21] J. C. Richards, J. Platt, H. Weber, and P. Inman, “Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics,” RELC Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 105–110, 1986, doi: 10.1177/003368828601700208.