Abstract:
General Background: Critical thinking is foundational in mathematics education, especially in probabilistic reasoning, which underpins decision-making under uncertainty. Specific Background: Despite its relevance, probability theory is often taught procedurally rather than conceptually, limiting students' reasoning skills. Knowledge Gap: Existing studies rarely integrate cognitive pedagogy with probability instruction, particularly in under-researched educational contexts like Uzbekistan. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the impact of a pedagogical model—incorporating inquiry, paradox analysis, and reflection—on developing tenth-grade students’ critical thinking in probability. Results: Using a quasi-experimental design, the intervention group significantly outperformed the control group in post-test scores (83.1 vs. 70.2), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.12). Improvements were particularly strong in logical inference, assumption evaluation, and problem analysis. Novelty: This research uniquely applies metacognitive strategies to probabilistic education within a context lacking prior integrative frameworks. Implications: Findings suggest that embedding critical thinking in probability instruction not only enhances cognitive skills but also supports broader curriculum reform and teacher development. The model holds promise for adaptation across diverse educational settings, contributing to a deeper, more transferable understanding of mathematics.
HIghlight :
Significant Skill Gains – Students in the experimental group improved critical thinking scores by over 20 points, nearly triple the control group’s gains.
Active Learning Methods – Paradox analysis, reflection, and inquiry-based tasks fostered deeper reasoning and better problem-solving in probability.
Educational Reform Implications – The study supports shifting from rote teaching to metacognitive, student-centered strategies in math instruction.
Keywords : Critical Thinking, Probability Theory, Inquiry Learning, Problem Solving, Metacognitive Strategy
References
L. M. van Peppen, P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen, A. E. G. Heijltjes, E. M. Janssen, and T. van Gog, "Enhancing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: Is Comparing Correct and Erroneous Examples Effective?," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09559-0](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09559-0)
I. R. Vysotskiy, "Popularization of Probability Theory and Statistics in School Through Intellectual Competitions," in Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Springer, 2018, pp. 719–730. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_40](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_40)
M. Kaplar, Z. Luzanin, and S. Verbic, "Evidence of Probability Misconception in Engineering Students—Why Even an Inaccurate Explanation Is Better Than No Explanation," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4, 2021. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00279-y](https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00279-y)
J. Beam, "Probabilistic Thinking from Elementary Grades to Graduate School," in Handbook of the Mathematics of the Arts and Sciences, Springer, 2021, pp. 1455–1470. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57072-3_49](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57072-3_49)
A. Schang, M. Dew, E. M. Stump, N. G. Holmes, and G. Passante, "New Perspectives on Student Reasoning About Measurement Uncertainty: More or Better Data," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2306.16975, 2023. [Online]. Available: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16975](https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.16975)
G. Lagubeau, S. Tecpan, and C. Hernandez, "Active Learning Reduces Academic Risk of Students with Non-Formal Reasoning Skills: Evidence from an Introductory Physics Massive Course in a Chilean Public University," arXiv preprint, arXiv:1909.01235, 2019. [Online]. Available: [https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01235](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01235)
A. Price, C. Kim, E. Burkholder, A. Fritz, and C. Wieman, "A Detailed Characterization of the Expert Problem-Solving Process in Science and Engineering: Guidance for Teaching and Assessment," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2005.11463, 2020. [Online]. Available: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11463](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11463)
A. Sirnoorkar and J. T. Laverty, "Theoretical Exploration of Task Features That Facilitate Student Sensemaking in Physics," arXiv preprint, arXiv:2302.11478, 2023. [Online]. Available: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11478](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11478)
C. Batanero, E. J. Chernoff, J. Engel, H. S. Lee, and E. Sanchez, "Research on Teaching and Learning Probability," in ICME-13 Topical Surveys, Springer, 2016, pp. 1–33. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1)
A. S. Hawkins and R. Kapadia, "Children's Conceptions of Probability — A Psychological and Pedagogical Review," Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 349–377, 1984. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311112](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311112)
J. E. Tarr and G. A. Jones, "A Framework for Assessing Middle School Students’ Thinking in Conditional Probability and Independence," Mathematics Education Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 1997. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217301](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217301)
G. A. Jones, Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning, Mathematics Education Library, vol. 40, Springer, 2005. [Online]. Available: [https://doi.org/10.1007/b105829](https://doi.org/10.1007/b105829)
L. M. van Peppen, P. P. J. L. Verkoeijen, A. E. G. Heijltjes, E. M. Janssen, and T. van Gog, "Enhancing Students' Critical Thinking Skills: Is Comparing Correct and Erroneous Examples Effective?," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2021.
M. Kaplar, Z. Luzanin, and S. Verbic, "Evidence of Probability Misconception in Engineering Students—Why Even an Inaccurate Explanation Is Better Than No Explanation," International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 4, 2021.
I. R. Vysotskiy, "Popularization of Probability Theory and Statistics in School Through Intellectual Competitions," in Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Springer, 2018, pp. 719–730.