Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/config.js
Login
Section Business and Economics

Sоciо-Ecоnоmic Wаys tо Imprоve the Well-Being of the Pоpulаtiоn

Vol 10 No 1 (2025): June:

Erkin Shаvqiev (1), Sаnjаr B. Bоbоkulоv (2)

(1) Depаrtment оf Digitаl Ecоnоmy, Sаmаrkаnd Institute оf Ecоnоmics аnd Service, Uzbekistan
(2) Depаrtment оf Digitаl Ecоnоmy, Sаmаrkаnd Institute оf Ecоnоmics аnd Service, Uzbekistan
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

General Background: Socio-economic disparities remain a pressing concern in many transitional economies, including Uzbekistan. Specific Background: Despite sustained economic growth, challenges such as income inequality, limited social protection, and regional development imbalances persist. Knowledge Gap: Prior studies have predominantly focused on macro-level welfare indicators without adequately assessing the impact of integrated digital and policy reforms on equitable growth. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of government-led socio-economic strategies in enhancing population well-being through digitalization, fiscal reform, and targeted employment initiatives. Results: Employing a qualitative methodology enriched with statistical abstraction and systemic analysis, the findings reveal a consistent rise in per capita income, albeit with persistent urban–rural disparities. Targeted programs—including digitalized social assistance, vocational training, and small enterprise support—have demonstrably contributed to poverty reduction and improved living standards. Novelty: The study uniquely integrates digital reform analysis with socio-economic policy evaluation, offering a comprehensive perspective on reform-driven equity enhancement. Implications: The results suggest that sustainable improvements in well-being require a cohesive policy framework emphasizing public investment, governance transparency, and inclusive economic practices.


Highlights : 



  • Integrated Reforms Work – Combining digitalization with fiscal and employment policies boosts income and reduces poverty.

  • Urban–Rural Disparity Persists – Income growth is uneven, with rural areas lagging behind urban centers.

  • Policy Coordination Is Key – Sustainable well-being relies on transparent, inclusive, and well-aligned public strategies.


Keywоrds : Income Inequality, Digital Reforms, Social Protection, Regional Development, Poverty Reduction

References

A. Sen and S. Stiglitz, Measuring What Counts: The Global Movement for Well-Being, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.1787/9789264307292-en.

A. Deaton, The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2019. doi: 10.1515/9781400847969.

M. Ravallion, Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2022: Correcting Course, Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Publications, 2022. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1892-2.

L. Haughton et al., “The Impact of Social Protection Programs on Inequality and Poverty in Developing Countries,” The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 913–933, 2022. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2021.1887475.

J. Stiglitz and B. Greenwald, Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress, New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press, 2020. doi: 10.7312/stig17966.

E. Gentilini, U. Blomquist, M. Honorati, and R. Yemtsov, Exploring Universal Basic Income: A Guide to Navigating Concepts, Evidence, and Practices, Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2020. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1458-0.

S. Alkire and J. Foster, “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement,” Journal of Economic Inequality, vol. 18, pp. 243–265, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10888-020-09436-4.

A. Sumner, E. Ortiz-Juarez, and C. Hoy, “Post-Pandemic Transformations: How and Why COVID-19 Requires Us to Rethink Development,” World Development, vol. 137, p. 105170, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105170.

M. Loewe and T. Zintl, “State Fragility and Social Protection in the Middle East and North Africa,” Social Protection Discussion Paper Series, World Bank, 2022. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3874916.

F. Ferreira, “Inequality in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective,” Annual Review of Economics, vol. 12, pp. 63–85, 2020. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-021420-020503.

N. Lustig and D. T. Higgins, “Inequality and Social Spending in Latin America,” Latin American Economic Review, vol. 29, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s40503-020-00103-3.

C. Evans and R. Krever, “Tax and Transfer Policy Responses to COVID-19 in Asia-Pacific,” Bulletin for International Taxation, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 160–174, 2021. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3593863.

A. Barrientos, “Social Protection and Poverty,” International Social Security Review, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 5–24, 2021. doi: 10.1111/issr.12237.

J. Ostry, A. Berg, and C. Tsangarides, Redistribution, Inequality, and Growth, IMF Staff Discussion Note, Washington, DC, USA: International Monetary Fund, 2021. doi: 10.5089/9781498342575.006.

S. Bastagli et al., Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? A Rigorous Review of Programme Impact and of the Role of Design and Implementation Features, London, UK: Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 2016.