Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/config.js
Login

PASH-BRAINS: Psychometric Validation of an Instrument Integrating Neurobiological and Spiritual Dimensions of Executive Function

Vol 10 No 1 (2025): June (In Progress):

Taufiq Frederik Pasiak (1), Margarita Maria Maramis (2), Dandy Aulya (3), Fajar Saputra Tubagus (4), Mevlana Muh Avicenna (5), Dwi Arwandi Yogi Saputra (6)

(1) Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Indonesia
(2) Department of Psychiatry, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia
(3) Research and Development, Indonesia Brain School-Manado, Indonesia
(4) Research and Development, Indonesia Brain School-Manado, Indonesia
(5) Research and Development, Indonesia Brain School-Manado, Indonesia
(6) Public Health Science Department Medical Faculty UPN Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia
Fulltext View | Download

Abstract:

While spirituality has increasingly been recognized as a vital component of holistic health, the scientific measurement of its neurobiological underpinnings remains underdeveloped. This study aims to test the construct validity of an innovative instrument measuring both Conventional Executive Function (CEF) and Transcendental Executive Function (TEF) using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Data were collected from 795 ethnically and religiously diverse participants across five Indonesian cities. Results revealed strong construct validity, with 88% of items demonstrating adequate factor loadings (≥0.4). The TEF dimensions had better measurement qualities, showing excellent fit with the model (RMSEA=0.020, CFI=0.999, TLI=0.999, SRMR=0.010) than the CEF dimensions. The Transcendence (0.315-0.925), Decision Making (0.642-0.857), and Meaning of Life (0.596-0.948) dimensions showed very strong relationships, which supports the idea that spiritual and transcendent thinking is linked to measurable brain activity.  These findings question the usual separation between rationality and spirituality, indicating that both are connected parts of how the brain works, which affects mental health treatments, psychospiritual evaluations, and our understanding of the connections between mind, brain, and spirit.

References

A. Bożek, P. F. Nowak, and M. Blukacz, “The Relationship Between Spirituality, Health-Related Behavior, and Psychological Well-Being,” Front Psychol, vol. 11, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01997.

H. G. Koenig, “Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications,” ISRN Psychiatry, vol. 2012, pp. 1–33, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.5402/2012/278730.

T. Huijs, A. W. Braam, R. Kruizinga, N. Jacobs, J. Reijnders, and M. Simons, “Spirituality as a Predictor of Well-Being, Mental Distress or Both: A Four-Week Follow-Up Study in a Sample of Dutch and Belgian Adults,” Religions (Basel), vol. 15, no. 2, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/rel15020179.

C. Dike et al., “Resource Document on Ethics at the Interface of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychiatric Practice,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/cultural-competency/engagement-opportunities/mental-

D. H. Rosmarin et al., “The neuroscience of spirituality, religion, and mental health: A systematic review and synthesis,” J Psychiatr Res, vol. 156, pp. 100–113, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.003.

E. Mohandas, “Neurobiology of Spirituality,” 2008. [Online]. Available: www.msmonographs.org

A. Newberg, N. Wintering, and M. Waldman, “Comparison of different measures of religiousness and spirituality: Implications for neurotheological research,” Religions (Basel), vol. 10, no. 11, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.3390/rel10110637.

M. A. Ferguson et al., “A Neural Circuit for Spirituality and Religiosity Derived From Patients With Brain Lesions,” Biol Psychiatry, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 380–388, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.016.

T. F. Pasiak, “MODEL PENJELASAN SPIRITUALITAS DALAM KONTEKS NEUROSAINS,” Uinversitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta, 2009.

T. F. Pasiak, PASH BRAINS. Fungsi Eksekutif Otak Konvensional dan Fungsi Eksekutif Otak Transendens. Manado: Sekolah Otak Indonesia, 2024.

John F Hair, Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. Pearson Edition Limited, 2014.

T. Nurharsono, B. Billiandri, and T. Soenyoto, “Validity and Reliability of Instruments in Physical Education Learning Multimedia,” Proceedings of International Conference on Physical Education, Health, and Sports, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/icophs.v3i1.2654.

P. Jones and P. Drummond, “The construction of a new Clinical Quality of Life Scale (CLINQOL),” BMC Psychol, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 210, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00912-7.

Y. Arfiani, P. Susongko, and M. Kusuma, “Construct validity analysis with messick validity approach and rasch model application on scientific reasoning test items,” Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 90–105, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Thabiea

Ryan T Daley and Elizabet A Kensinger, “Age-related differences in Default Mode Network resting-state functional connectivity but not gray matter volume relate to sacrificial moral decision-making and working memory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 177, Dec. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108399.