Abstract:
General Background: Modern criminal justice systems are increasingly shifting toward alternative sanctions to incarceration, responding to the humanitarian, social, and economic burdens of traditional punitive measures. Specific Background: Overcrowded prisons, escalating costs, and rising crime rates highlight the inefficiency of imprisonment-centered policies. Knowledge Gap: Despite international recognition of alternatives, there remains limited comparative research on their effectiveness, legal structures, and practical implementation across diverse legal systems. Aims: This study investigates the legal frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, and operational challenges of alternative sanctions—including community service, house arrest, electronic monitoring, fines, and rehabilitation—across four countries: France, the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. Results: The findings reveal variations in the success of alternative sanctions based on legislative support, enforcement resources, and public acceptance. Strong institutional backing and legal clarity are key to effective implementation. Novelty: By combining descriptive and comparative analyses using legal texts, judicial decisions, human rights reports, and academic literature, the study uniquely synthesizes multi-jurisdictional insights on non-custodial sanctions. Implications: The research advocates for reinforced legal infrastructures, capacity-building within enforcement bodies, and public awareness campaigns to ensure sustainable application of humane and cost-effective alternatives to imprisonment.
Highlights:
Shift from prison to humane alternative sanctions
Comparative study of four legal systems
Emphasizes law, enforcement, and public awareness
Keywords: Alternative sanctions, criminal justice, imprisonment, legal systems, rehabilitation
References
[1] S. Neveu, "Probation measures and alternative sanctions in Europe: From the 1964 convention to the 2008 framework decision," New Journal of European Criminal Law, vol. 4, pp. 134-153, 2013.[2] M. Bradley, "A humanitarian agency in global migration governance: the International Committee of the Red Cross's migration policy and practice," in Research Handbook on the Institutions of Global Migration Governance, ed: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp. 89-101.
[3] M. Herzog-Evans, "Community Corrections in France," in The Routledge Handbook on Global Community Corrections, ed: Routledge, 2024, pp. 174-194.
[4] H. Schoenfeld and M. C. Campbell, "Early 21st century penal reform: A comparative analysis of four states' responses to the problems of mass incarceration," Law & Policy, vol. 45, pp. 482-506, 2023.
[5] K. S. B. Al-Jbour and A. A. Ibrahim, "Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Freedom-Depriving Penalties in Jordanian Criminal Legislation," in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Finance, ed: Springer, 2023, pp. 297-307.
[6] Y. Nafid, M. A. Haidass, and S. Joraiche, "The Role of Criminal Alternatives as a Future Challenge in Achieving Security," International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, vol. 19, pp. 552-586, 2024.
[7] D. van Zijl-Smit and F. Dünkel, Imprisonment today and tomorrow: International perspectives on prisoners' rights and prison conditions, Brill, 2021.
[8] J. A. Tyabina and O. V. Kochkina, "Imprisonment: Problems Of Application And Ways Of Reforming," European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences.
[9] T. M. Lenton, S. Benson, T. Smith, T. Ewer, V. Lanel, E. Petykowski, et al., "Operationalising positive tipping points towards global sustainability," Global Sustainability, vol. 5, p. e1, 2022.
[10] A. Ashworth and R. Kelly, Sentencing and criminal justice: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021.
[11] E. Barton, C. Drozd, A. Fatooh, K. Ferguson, M. Gale, P. Garcha, et al., "Review of Alternatives to Incarceration Efforts Worldwide," 2021.