Abstract:
General Background: Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie has long been recognized for its psychological complexity and portrayal of familial dysfunction. Specific Background: While many analyses focus on psychoanalytic or realist readings, the play also invites exploration through existential philosophy, particularly that of Jean-Paul Sartre. Knowledge Gap: Limited scholarly attention has been given to examining the play through an existentialist-expressivist lens that bridges literary technique and philosophical inquiry. Aim: This paper aims to reinterpret The Glass Menagerie through Sartrean existentialism, focusing on themes of freedom, identity, and authenticity. Results: The study finds that Williams employs memory and expressionist techniques to illustrate characters’ existential crises, highlighting their struggles with "bad faith," alienation, and the burden of freedom. Amanda, Tom, and Laura each embody forms of existential angst and self-deception, yet their experiences also signal the possibility of self-assertion and authentic living. Novelty: The paper offers a novel reading by integrating Sartrean concepts such as subjectivity, personal responsibility, and authenticity with Williams’s theatrical method, revealing deeper existential dimensions of the play. Implications: This perspective not only broadens the interpretative scope of the play but also demonstrates how literary works can serve as philosophical discourses, emphasizing the relevance of existential thought in analyzing human experience amid socio-political pressures.
Highlights:
Explores The Glass Menagerie through Sartrean existential philosophy.
Analyzes characters' identity, freedom, and existential crisis via expressionism.
Reveals existential depth and philosophical relevance in Williams’s dramatic technique.
Keywords: Existentialism, Expressionism, Jean-Paul Sartre, Tennessee Williams, Plastic Theatre, Subjective Identity.
References
H. Bloom, Tennessee Williams. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 1987.
H. Bloom, Bloom’s Guides: Tennessee Williams's The Glass Menagerie, New
York: Infobase Publishing, 2007.
C. W. E. Bigsby, A critical introduction to twentieth-century drama: Tennessee
Williams, Arthur Miller, Edward Albee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
J. Parini, American Writers Classics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,
J.P. Sartre, Being and nothingness: An Essay on phenomenological ontology
trans. S. Richmond. London: Routledge, 2018.
J. P. Sartre, Existentialism and humanism. London: Methuen, 1973.
R. S. Furness, Expressionism. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Expressionism," Encyclopedia
Britannica [Online]. Feb. 11, 2025. Available: https://www.britannica.com/art/Expressionism. Accessed: Oct. 7, 2023.
R. Freedman, "The Contours of literary expressionism". Contemporary
Literature, [Online]. vol.10, no. 1, pp. 54-74, 1969. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1207582.
G. John, Masters of drama. New York: Dover Publications Inc, 1945.
C. E. W. L Dahlstrom, Strindberg's dramatic expressionism. Ann
Arbor,Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1930.
J. Gassner, Form and idea in modern theatre. New York: Dryden
Press, 1956.
J. Lahr, Tennessee Williams: Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh. W.W. Norton &
Company, 2014.
S. Sontag, (2012, May, 16). "Review: The Glass Menagerie." [Online].
Available: https://toribush.com/2012/05/16/review-the-glass-menagerie/
M. Fisher, (2022, Sept. 8). "The Glass Menagerie review." The Guardian.
[Online]. Available:https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2022/sep/08/the-glass-menagerie-review-royal-exchange-manchester
T. Williams, "Production Notes," in The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed. New York:
New Directions, 1999, pp. xix-xxii.
T. Scanlan, "Family and Psyche in The Glass Menagerie," in The Glass
Menagerie: A Collection of Critical Essays, R.B. Parker, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983, pp. 96-108.
T. Williams, The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed. New York: Dramatists Play Service,
Inc, 1976.
R. Bray, "Introduction," in Tennessee Williams: The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed,
T. Williams. New York: New Directions Publishing Corp, 1999, pp. vii-xvi.
C. W. E. Bigsby, Modern American drama, 1945-2000. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2004.
M. Kakutani, (1983, March, 6). "The Legacy of Tennessee Williams. [Online]
Available:https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/06/theater/the-legacy-of-tennessee-williams.html
D. E. Presley, The Glass Menagerie: An American Memory. Boston, MA: G.
K. Hall & Co, 1990.
R. Colanzi, "Caged birds: bad faith in Tennessee William’s drama." Modern
Drama, vol. 35, no.1, pp. 451–65. Sept 1992.
J. Adam, Versions of heroism in modern American drama: Redefinitions by
Miller, Williams, O'Neill, and Anderson. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.
B. Nelson, "The Play is memory," in Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Glass Menagerie, R.B. Parker, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983, pp.87-95.
A. Griffin, "The Character of Amanda Wingfield," in Readings on The Glass
Menagerie, T. Siebold, Ed. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1998, pp.61-65.
P. Bhawar. (2020, Nov-Dec)."Conflict between Reality and Illusion in Tennessee Williams’ play The Glass Menagerie," [Online]. IJELSS, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2166. Available: https://ijels.com/. DOI: 10.22161/ijels.56.50.
F. W. Chandler, Modern continental playwrights. New York: Publisher, Harper
& Brothers,1931.
S. B. Hammer, "'That Quiet little play’: Bourgeois tragedy, female impersonation, and a portrait of the artist in The Glass Menagerie," in Tennessee Williams: A Casebook. R. F. Gross, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2002, pp.33-50.
T. A. Greenfield, "The Glass Menagerie as social commentary," in Readings on The Glass Menagerie T. Siebold, Ed. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 998, pp.73-79.
T. Williams, "The Catastrophe of success," in Tennessee Williams: The Glass
Menagerie, T. Williams. New York: New Directions Publishing Corp., 1999, pp.91-99.