Academia Open
Vol 10 No 1 (2025): June (In Progress)
Philosophy. Psychology. Religion

Existential Identity and Authenticity in The Glass Menagerie Through Sartrean Lens
Disfungsi Kelenjar Adrenal dan Kaitannya dengan Gangguan Endokrin


View Article
  • Najlaa Atshan Khalaf Al-musawi*
Najlaa Atshan Khalaf Al-musawi
Collage of Medicine University of Thi-Qar, Iraq *

(*) Corresponding Author
Picture in here are illustration from public domain image or provided by the author, as part of their works
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.10798
Published April 7, 2025
Keywords
  • Existentialism,
  • Expressionism,
  • Jean-Paul Sartre,
  • Tennessee Williams,
  • Plastic Theatre,
  • Subjective Identity
    • ...More
    Less
How to Cite
Al-musawi, N. A. K. (2025). Existential Identity and Authenticity in The Glass Menagerie Through Sartrean Lens. Academia Open, 10(1), 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.10798. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.10798

Copyright (c) 2025 Najlaa Atshan Khalaf Al-musawi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

General Background: Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie has long been recognized for its psychological complexity and portrayal of familial dysfunction. Specific Background: While many analyses focus on psychoanalytic or realist readings, the play also invites exploration through existential philosophy, particularly that of Jean-Paul Sartre. Knowledge Gap: Limited scholarly attention has been given to examining the play through an existentialist-expressivist lens that bridges literary technique and philosophical inquiry. Aim: This paper aims to reinterpret The Glass Menagerie through Sartrean existentialism, focusing on themes of freedom, identity, and authenticity. Results: The study finds that Williams employs memory and expressionist techniques to illustrate characters’ existential crises, highlighting their struggles with "bad faith," alienation, and the burden of freedom. Amanda, Tom, and Laura each embody forms of existential angst and self-deception, yet their experiences also signal the possibility of self-assertion and authentic living. Novelty: The paper offers a novel reading by integrating Sartrean concepts such as subjectivity, personal responsibility, and authenticity with Williams’s theatrical method, revealing deeper existential dimensions of the play. Implications: This perspective not only broadens the interpretative scope of the play but also demonstrates how literary works can serve as philosophical discourses, emphasizing the relevance of existential thought in analyzing human experience amid socio-political pressures.

Highlights:

 

  1. Explores The Glass Menagerie through Sartrean existential philosophy.

  2. Analyzes characters' identity, freedom, and existential crisis via expressionism.

  3. Reveals existential depth and philosophical relevance in Williams’s dramatic technique.

Keywords: Existentialism, Expressionism, Jean-Paul Sartre, Tennessee Williams, Plastic Theatre, Subjective Identity.

 

View Article

Downloads

Metrics

Other format views
2
Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
No metrics available.
-
see details

References

  1. H. Bloom, Tennessee Williams. New York: Chelsea House Publishing, 1987.
  2. H. Bloom, Bloom’s Guides: Tennessee Williams's The Glass Menagerie, New
  3. York: Infobase Publishing, 2007.
  4. C. W. E. Bigsby, A critical introduction to twentieth-century drama: Tennessee
  5. Williams, Arthur Miller, Edward Albee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
  6. J. Parini, American Writers Classics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons,
  8. J.P. Sartre, Being and nothingness: An Essay on phenomenological ontology
  9. trans. S. Richmond. London: Routledge, 2018.
  10. J. P. Sartre, Existentialism and humanism. London: Methuen, 1973.
  11. R. S. Furness, Expressionism. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
  12. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, "Expressionism," Encyclopedia
  13. Britannica [Online]. Feb. 11, 2025. Available: https://www.britannica.com/art/Expressionism. Accessed: Oct. 7, 2023.
  14. R. Freedman, "The Contours of literary expressionism". Contemporary
  15. Literature, [Online]. vol.10, no. 1, pp. 54-74, 1969. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1207582.
  16. G. John, Masters of drama. New York: Dover Publications Inc, 1945.
  17. C. E. W. L Dahlstrom, Strindberg's dramatic expressionism. Ann
  18. Arbor,Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1930.
  19. J. Gassner, Form and idea in modern theatre. New York: Dryden
  20. Press, 1956.
  21. J. Lahr, Tennessee Williams: Mad Pilgrimage of the Flesh. W.W. Norton &
  22. Company, 2014.
  23. S. Sontag, (2012, May, 16). "Review: The Glass Menagerie." [Online].
  24. Available: https://toribush.com/2012/05/16/review-the-glass-menagerie/
  25. M. Fisher, (2022, Sept. 8). "The Glass Menagerie review." The Guardian.
  26. [Online]. Available:https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2022/sep/08/the-glass-menagerie-review-royal-exchange-manchester
  27. T. Williams, "Production Notes," in The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed. New York:
  28. New Directions, 1999, pp. xix-xxii.
  29. T. Scanlan, "Family and Psyche in The Glass Menagerie," in The Glass
  30. Menagerie: A Collection of Critical Essays, R.B. Parker, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983, pp. 96-108.
  31. T. Williams, The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed. New York: Dramatists Play Service,
  32. Inc, 1976.
  33. R. Bray, "Introduction," in Tennessee Williams: The Glass Menagerie, 3rd ed,
  34. T. Williams. New York: New Directions Publishing Corp, 1999, pp. vii-xvi.
  35. C. W. E. Bigsby, Modern American drama, 1945-2000. Cambridge:
  36. Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  37. M. Kakutani, (1983, March, 6). "The Legacy of Tennessee Williams. [Online]
  38. Available:https://www.nytimes.com/1983/03/06/theater/the-legacy-of-tennessee-williams.html
  39. D. E. Presley, The Glass Menagerie: An American Memory. Boston, MA: G.
  40. K. Hall & Co, 1990.
  41. R. Colanzi, "Caged birds: bad faith in Tennessee William’s drama." Modern
  42. Drama, vol. 35, no.1, pp. 451–65. Sept 1992.
  43. J. Adam, Versions of heroism in modern American drama: Redefinitions by
  44. Miller, Williams, O'Neill, and Anderson. New York: St. Martin's, 1991.
  45. B. Nelson, "The Play is memory," in Twentieth Century Interpretations of The Glass Menagerie, R.B. Parker, Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983, pp.87-95.
  46. A. Griffin, "The Character of Amanda Wingfield," in Readings on The Glass
  47. Menagerie, T. Siebold, Ed. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 1998, pp.61-65.
  48. P. Bhawar. (2020, Nov-Dec)."Conflict between Reality and Illusion in Tennessee Williams’ play The Glass Menagerie," [Online]. IJELSS, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2166. Available: https://ijels.com/. DOI: 10.22161/ijels.56.50.
  49. F. W. Chandler, Modern continental playwrights. New York: Publisher, Harper
  50. & Brothers,1931.
  51. S. B. Hammer, "'That Quiet little play’: Bourgeois tragedy, female impersonation, and a portrait of the artist in The Glass Menagerie," in Tennessee Williams: A Casebook. R. F. Gross, Ed. New York: Routledge, 2002, pp.33-50.
  52. T. A. Greenfield, "The Glass Menagerie as social commentary," in Readings on The Glass Menagerie T. Siebold, Ed. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, Inc., 998, pp.73-79.
  53. T. Williams, "The Catastrophe of success," in Tennessee Williams: The Glass
  54. Menagerie, T. Williams. New York: New Directions Publishing Corp., 1999, pp.91-99.