Abstract:
General Background: Colombia's economy has undergone significant transformations, influenced by global and domestic factors. Specific Background: While historically reliant on agriculture and energy resources, recent shifts emphasize services, infrastructure, and trade diversification. Knowledge Gap: Despite sustained economic growth, challenges persist in employment generation, economic equity, and macroeconomic stability. Aims: This study analyzes Colombia’s economic transition, assessing policy changes, GDP fluctuations, and structural composition to identify key drivers of economic recovery. Results: Findings indicate that economic growth prospects are strongly linked to investments in green energy and tourism expansion. Inflation reached 9.7% in 2023, negatively affecting consumer spending, while rising public debt necessitates careful fiscal management. Novelty: This research provides a comprehensive evaluation of Colombia’s evolving economic model, highlighting the role of sustainable investments and technological modernization in fostering long-term stability. Implications: The study offers critical insights for policymakers in designing strategies to enhance economic resilience through green technology investments, service sector expansion, and global market adaptation.
Highlights:
- Economic Shift – From agriculture to services and trade diversification.
- Key Drivers – Green energy and tourism boost economic growth.
- Policy Focus – Manage inflation, public debt, and macroeconomic stability.
Keywords: Colombian economy, economic transition, green energy, GDP fluctuations, policy planning
References
I. M. D. M. Adnyana, K. A. Mahendra, and S. M. Raza, “The importance of green education in primary, secondary and higher education: A review,” J. Environ. Sustain. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 42-lastpage, 2023.
P. Aghion and P. Howitt, “A model of growth through creative destruction,” Econometrica, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 323–351, 1992.
H. B. Chenery, S. Robinson, and M. Syrquin, Industrialization and growth: A comparative study. Washington: World Bank, Oxford University Press, 1986.
C. N. de M. Histórica, Una Sociedad Secuestrada. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional, 2013.
CEPAL, El Desarrollo Económico de Colombia, Análisis y Proyecciones del Desarrollo. 1957.
S. Clavijo, M. Janna, and S. Munoz, “La Vivienda en Colombia: Sus Determinantes Socio-Económicos y Financieros,” Desarro. Soc., pp. 101–165, 2005.
I. Britchenko, M. Bezpartochnyi, and P. Jarosz, “Economic diagnostics in ensuring of competitiveness the economic entities,” 2019.
R. Bonilla and J. I. González, Eds., Bien-Estar y Macroeconomía 2002/2006: Crecimiento Insuficiente, Inequitativo e Insostenible. Bogotá: CID-Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Contraloría General de la República, 2006.
R. Barro, “Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth,” J. Polit. Econ., vol. 98, no. 5, pp. S103–S117, 1990.
H. B. Chenery and M. Syrquin, Patterns of development 1950–1970. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
L. Currie, “Allyn Young and the development of growth theory,” 1981.
M. Alonso Monterde, V. Gomez Lozano, I. Guillen Guillamon, J. Higon Calvet, and P. A. López-Jiménez, “Sustainable building strategies on regional scale: Proposal for the Valencian region in Spain,” Indoor Built Environ., vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1054–1064, 2016.
D. Brown, E. Rocco, and A. Wegmann, “How does proximity affect marketing cooperation? A study of agribusiness clusters in a Latin-American emerging economy,” 2013, [Online]. Available: https://www.balas.org/BALAS_2013...data/.../p636496.pdf
U. Andrusiv and L. Simkiv, “Knowledge economy: trends in the world and analysis of Ukraine,” J. East. Eur. Cent. Asian Res., 2020.
M. Aguiar and G. Gopinath, “Emerging Market Business Cycles: The Cycle is the Trend,” J. Polit. Econ., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 69–102, 2007.